SUMMA-35: ImageService processing frontend #130
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update refactors both frontend and backend components related to content editing and image handling. Key changes include new image upload and validation logic, improved modularity and error handling in the content editor, route and authentication adjustments, and updates to comment styles. No core functionality is altered, but maintainability and clarity are enhanced. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ContentEditor
participant ImageService
participant Backend
User->>ContentEditor: Selects or edits content, uploads thumbnail
ContentEditor->>ImageService: uploadThumbnail(thumbnailFile)
ImageService->>ImageService: Resize, validate, compress image
ImageService->>Backend: POST /api/content/upload-thumbnail (multipart/form-data)
Backend-->>ImageService: Returns thumbnail URL or error
ImageService-->>ContentEditor: Returns thumbnail URL or error
ContentEditor->>Backend: POST/PUT content with thumbnail URL and data
Backend-->>ContentEditor: Returns success or error
ContentEditor-->>User: Navigates or displays error
Suggested reviewers
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate Unit Tests
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
frontend/src/services/NotificationService.ts (1)
31-35: Remove noisyconsole.logor guard it behind a logger flagShipping raw
console.logcalls can leak PII in production and pollute client consoles. Consider a proper logger or strip in production bundles.frontend/src/services/SubscriptionService.ts (1)
6-12: Redundant@returnstags – pick one per outcomeThree consecutive
@returnslines makes generated docs confusing:* @returns A promise … * @returns {Promise<{url: string}>} * @returns {Error}Collapse to a single
@returnsline (or use@throwsfor errors) to keep tooling output clean.frontend/src/services/CommentService.ts (1)
5-11:/* … */loses JSDoc/intellisense support – deliberate?Changing
/** … */to/* … */strips JSDoc, so IDEs no longer show typed hints for parameters/returns.
If you only wanted visual style consistency, prefer keeping the opening/**while removing@tags you dislike.
Otherwise you trade off DX for style.frontend/src/services/UserService.ts (1)
5-12: Mixed comment styles in same fileLines 13-21 still use
/** … */while the rest switched to/* … */. Decide on one style to avoid churn in future diffs.frontend/src/services/FollowService.ts (1)
5-10: Consider retaining JSDoc comments for better tooling support.Converting from JSDoc-style comments (
/** ... */) to regular multiline comments (/* ... */) removes valuable benefits such as:
- Automatic documentation generation
- Enhanced IDE intellisense and hover information
- Better TypeScript integration
- Standard documentation format for service classes
JSDoc comments are particularly valuable for service classes like this one that expose public APIs.
Also applies to: 12-21, 47-56, 81-89, 110-118, 139-147, 169-178, 204-213
frontend/src/services/ImageService.ts (1)
9-152: Consider refactoring to standalone functions instead of a static-only class.The static analysis correctly identifies that this class contains only static members. This pattern is generally discouraged in favor of standalone functions, which are more tree-shakable and follow functional programming principles.
Consider refactoring to standalone functions:
-export class ImageService { - public static async uploadThumbnail( +export async function uploadThumbnail( thumbnail: File ): Promise<{ url: string } | Error> { try { - const preparedFile = await ImageService.prepareImageForUpload(thumbnail); + const preparedFile = await prepareImageForUpload(thumbnail); // ... rest of implementation } } - private static async prepareImageForUpload(file: File): Promise<File> { +async function prepareImageForUpload(file: File): Promise<File> { // ... implementation } // ... other functionsThis would make the code more modular and easier to test individual functions.
frontend/src/pages/content/ContentEditor.tsx (1)
282-282: Address the TODO comment.The TODO indicates plans to move thumbnail logic to a content service, which would further improve separation of concerns.
Would you like me to help design the content service structure or create an issue to track this refactoring task?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (15)
backend/src/modules/content/controllers/content.controller.ts(5 hunks)backend/src/modules/content/routes/content.routes.ts(2 hunks)backend/src/modules/storage/services/storage.service.ts(1 hunks)frontend/eslint.config.js(1 hunks)frontend/src/App.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/components/content/CommentList.tsx(1 hunks)frontend/src/pages/content/ContentEditor.tsx(6 hunks)frontend/src/services/AuthenticationService.ts(9 hunks)frontend/src/services/CommentService.ts(5 hunks)frontend/src/services/FollowService.ts(7 hunks)frontend/src/services/ImageService.ts(1 hunks)frontend/src/services/NotificationService.ts(3 hunks)frontend/src/services/SubscriptionService.ts(3 hunks)frontend/src/services/UserService.ts(9 hunks)frontend/src/styles/content/createContent.scss(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (4)
backend/src/modules/content/routes/content.routes.ts (1)
backend/src/shared/middleware/auth.ts (1)
authenticateToken(20-67)
backend/src/modules/storage/services/storage.service.ts (1)
backend/src/shared/utils/logger.ts (1)
logger(28-49)
backend/src/modules/content/controllers/content.controller.ts (1)
backend/src/modules/content/services/content.service.ts (1)
ContentService(27-854)
frontend/src/services/ImageService.ts (1)
frontend/src/scripts/api.ts (1)
apiURL(8-8)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
frontend/src/services/ImageService.ts
[error] 9-152: Avoid classes that contain only static members.
Prefer using simple functions instead of classes with only static members.
(lint/complexity/noStaticOnlyClass)
🔇 Additional comments (16)
frontend/src/services/NotificationService.ts (1)
75-88: Let’s confirm the currentmarkAsReadimplementation and its HTTP call to determine whethernotificationIdis used or truly “mark all.”#!/bin/bash # Locate and display the markAsRead method in NotificationService.ts rg -n "static async markAsRead" -n frontend/src/services/NotificationService.ts --context 5frontend/src/services/AuthenticationService.ts (1)
4-11: Same JSDoc-to-plain-comment swap – verify tooling impactAs with other services, swapping to
/*disables automatic doc generation & TS intellisense. Confirm this is an intentional repo-wide decision before merging.frontend/src/styles/content/createContent.scss (1)
98-104: Excellent styling improvements for responsive image display.The changes enhance the thumbnail preview functionality:
- Using
max-width/max-heightinstead of fixed dimensions provides better responsive behavior- Adding
object-fit: coverprevents image distortion while maintaining aspect ratio- The explanatory comment clearly documents the intent
These changes align well with modern CSS practices for responsive image handling.
frontend/eslint.config.js (2)
1-25: LGTM on the quote style consistency.The conversion from single quotes to double quotes provides consistent formatting throughout the configuration file.
Also applies to: 27-29
26-26: Reconsider disabling the exhaustive-deps rule.Disabling
"react-hooks/exhaustive-deps"removes an important safety check that helps prevent common React hooks issues such as:
- Stale closures in useEffect
- Missing dependencies causing bugs
- Infinite re-render loops
This rule should only be disabled if there's a specific, well-documented reason.
Can you provide justification for why this rule needs to be disabled? If it's causing false positives in specific cases, consider using eslint-disable comments on those specific lines instead of globally disabling the rule.
frontend/src/components/content/CommentList.tsx (1)
58-61: Good defensive programming practice.Adding the conditional check for
commentsResultbefore updating state prevents potential issues with undefined or null values. This complements the existing error handling and ensures the component state remains consistent.backend/src/modules/content/routes/content.routes.ts (2)
4-4: LGTM on adding authentication middleware import.The import supports the security enhancement for the content editing route.
27-31: Excellent security improvement for content editing.The changes significantly enhance security by:
- Removing the
userIdparameter from the URL path, preventing URL manipulation attacks- Adding
authenticateTokenmiddleware to verify user identity via JWT token- Ensuring the controller receives the authenticated user ID from
req.user.uidinstead of trusting URL parametersThis prevents unauthorized users from editing others' content by manipulating the URL parameters.
frontend/src/App.tsx (1)
103-110: Excellent routing improvement!The separation of create and edit routes with explicit
isEditModeprops improves code clarity and makes the component behavior more predictable. This aligns well with the ContentEditor refactoring.backend/src/modules/content/controllers/content.controller.ts (2)
89-91: Good security improvement in authentication handling.Retrieving the user ID from
req.user?.uidinstead of request parameters is more secure and aligns with the authentication middleware changes. This prevents potential authorization bypass through URL manipulation.Also applies to: 98-98
108-108: Consider the error status code change.The error status code was changed from 401 to 500. Ensure this aligns with your error handling strategy - 401 (Unauthorized) might be more appropriate for authorization failures than 500 (Internal Server Error).
frontend/src/services/ImageService.ts (2)
61-61: Good file size validation.The 5MB limit is reasonable for thumbnail images, especially given the resizing to 1280x1280 pixels that occurs beforehand.
86-99: Solid aspect ratio preservation logic.The image resizing logic correctly maintains aspect ratio and properly handles both width and height constraints. Good implementation!
frontend/src/pages/content/ContentEditor.tsx (3)
150-158: Well-implemented URL to File conversion.The
urlToFilefunction correctly handles the conversion from URL to File object, which is essential for editing existing content with thumbnails.
166-176: Good separation of concerns with clearContent helper.Extracting the clear functionality into a dedicated function improves code organization and reusability.
284-296: Excellent ImageService integration with proper error handling.The integration with
ImageService.uploadThumbnailis clean and includes proper error handling by checking if the response is an Error instance.
| // Returning URL for the file | ||
| const urlPath = `${filePath}/${fileName}`; | ||
| const url = `http://localhost:3000/local_uploads/${urlPath}`; | ||
|
|
||
| // Return the absolute file system path | ||
| return { url: fullPath }; | ||
| return { url }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Update the misleading comment.
The comment on line 120 states "Return the absolute file system path" but the method now returns a URL string. This inconsistency could confuse future developers.
- // Return the absolute file system path
+ // Return the URL for accessing the uploaded file
return { url };📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // Returning URL for the file | |
| const urlPath = `${filePath}/${fileName}`; | |
| const url = `http://localhost:3000/local_uploads/${urlPath}`; | |
| // Return the absolute file system path | |
| return { url: fullPath }; | |
| return { url }; | |
| // Returning URL for the file | |
| const urlPath = `${filePath}/${fileName}`; | |
| const url = `http://localhost:3000/local_uploads/${urlPath}`; | |
| // Return the URL for accessing the uploaded file | |
| return { url }; |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In backend/src/modules/storage/services/storage.service.ts around lines 116 to
121, the comment on line 120 incorrectly states "Return the absolute file system
path" while the code actually returns a URL string. Update this comment to
accurately reflect that the method returns a URL string pointing to the file
location, removing any mention of an absolute file system path to avoid
confusion.
| if (!auth.isAuthenticated) { | ||
| navigate("/authentication/login"); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve authentication check pattern.
The current authentication check executes on every render, which could cause unnecessary redirects. Consider using a useEffect hook to handle this more efficiently.
- // User must be authenticated to create content
- if (!auth.isAuthenticated) {
- navigate("/authentication/login");
- }
+ // User must be authenticated to create content
+ useEffect(() => {
+ if (!auth.isAuthenticated) {
+ navigate("/authentication/login");
+ }
+ }, [auth.isAuthenticated, navigate]);This prevents the redirect from being triggered on every render and follows React best practices.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (!auth.isAuthenticated) { | |
| navigate("/authentication/login"); | |
| } | |
| // User must be authenticated to create content | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (!auth.isAuthenticated) { | |
| navigate("/authentication/login"); | |
| } | |
| }, [auth.isAuthenticated, navigate]); |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/src/pages/content/ContentEditor.tsx around lines 312 to 314, the
authentication check runs on every render causing unnecessary redirects.
Refactor the code to move the authentication check and navigate call inside a
useEffect hook with an empty dependency array or appropriate dependencies, so
the redirect only happens once when the component mounts or when authentication
state changes, following React best practices.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Style
Chores