Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Uncomment asserts #539

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Uncomment asserts #539

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

penelopeysm
Copy link
Member

@penelopeysm penelopeysm commented Oct 17, 2024

The docs contain some assertions to make sure that e.g. posterior predictions are numerically accurate. Due to #533 these assertions were sometimes randomly failing, and I had to comment them out to avoid spurious CI failures.

Since the upstream issue has been fixed, this PR re-enables the assertions.

Closes #533.

@penelopeysm
Copy link
Member Author

penelopeysm commented Oct 18, 2024

Actually the upstream issue is not fully fixed; there is a new version of QuartoNotebookRunner.jl with the fix (0.11.5) but Quarto itself needs to be updated https://github.com/quarto-dev/quarto-cli/blob/cf81582a26c4e43501f21ae5dec4d8be90acd4e3/src/resources/julia/Project.toml

Blocked by upstream I guess.

@penelopeysm penelopeysm marked this pull request as draft October 18, 2024 00:23
@penelopeysm
Copy link
Member Author

penelopeysm commented Oct 18, 2024

PRs submitted to Quarto. quarto-dev/quarto-cli#11100 and quarto-dev/quarto-cli#11101

Once that is merged and a new version released we just need to make sure that CI loads a new enough version of Quarto.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Random assertions can fail randomly (despite seeding)
1 participant