Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should validation work in watch mode? #2584

Closed
Ben-at-h opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Should validation work in watch mode? #2584

Ben-at-h opened this issue Jun 3, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Functionality does not match expectation
Milestone
v0.26.0

Comments

@Ben-at-h
Copy link

Ben-at-h commented Jun 3, 2024

Search terms

validation, notDocumented, requiredToBeDocumented, watch mode.

Question

Should warnings show up when using TypeDoc in watch mode?
I have been running TypeDoc with "notDocumented" set to true and the standard "requiredToBeDocumented" options as suggested in the online documentation. When I run TypeDoc out of watch mode I get around 20 warnings as expected, but when using watch mode on the same code I get the following:

[info] Starting compilation in watch mode...
[info] Found 0 errors. Watching for file changes.
[info] Documentation generated at ./docs
@Ben-at-h Ben-at-h added the question Question about functionality label Jun 3, 2024
@Gerrit0
Copy link
Collaborator

Gerrit0 commented Jun 3, 2024

I'm pretty sure that's just an oversight, should be an easy fix!

@Gerrit0 Gerrit0 added bug Functionality does not match expectation and removed question Question about functionality labels Jun 9, 2024
Gerrit0 added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 9, 2024
@Gerrit0
Run validation in watch mode
d9096d0 
Fixes #2584
@Gerrit0 Gerrit0 added this to the v0.26.0 milestone Jun 9, 2024
@Gerrit0 Gerrit0 mentioned this issue Jun 9, 2024
Closed
7 tasks
@Gerrit0
Copy link
Collaborator

Gerrit0 commented Jun 16, 2024

Fixed with 0.26, which is releasing 2024/06/21

@Gerrit0 Gerrit0 closed this as completed Jun 16, 2024
@fluxpayments1 fluxpayments1 mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2024
Open
@AlexXanderGrib AlexXanderGrib mentioned this issue Jul 13, 2024
Closed
@kalbroni7 kalbroni7 mentioned this issue Jul 16, 2024
Open
@Douhgn Douhgn mentioned this issue Jul 17, 2024
Open
@snyk-io snyk-io bot mentioned this issue Jul 18, 2024
Open
@WontonSam WontonSam mentioned this issue Jul 19, 2024
Open
This was referenced Jul 27, 2024
Open
Merged
Merged
@josias-devvv josias-devvv mentioned this issue Aug 15, 2024
Open
@snyk-io snyk-io bot mentioned this issue Aug 18, 2024
Open
@satoshinakamoto007 satoshinakamoto007 mentioned this issue Sep 9, 2024
Open
@dasunhegoda dasunhegoda mentioned this issue Sep 17, 2024
Open
@johannesleite johannesleite mentioned this issue Sep 17, 2024
Open
@WontonSam WontonSam mentioned this issue Oct 1, 2024
Open
@ender700 ender700 mentioned this issue Oct 19, 2024
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
bug Functionality does not match expectation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v0.26.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Gerrit0 @Ben-at-h