Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

contraception: use default consumables availability #975

Open
EvaJanouskova opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

contraception: use default consumables availability #975

EvaJanouskova opened this issue May 22, 2023 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@EvaJanouskova
Copy link
Collaborator

To be able to use the default consumables availability, we need:

(1) Use the item codes Item_Code_Avail instead of Item_Code (both in ResourceFile_Consumables_Items_and_Packages.csv).
(What about the availability of items for which we do not have similar item we could approximate the availability on?)

(2) Determine which items are essential.

@tbhallett
Copy link
Collaborator

@EvaJanouskova --it seems like this is now done?

@EvaJanouskova
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@tbhallett, No, it's not. Item_Code_Avail is prepared in the RF, not used in the model yet. And we do not distinguish non-essential consumables yet (except the pregnancy test).

@EvaJanouskova
Copy link
Collaborator Author

EvaJanouskova commented Dec 10, 2024

To be able to use the default consumables availability, we need:

(1) Use the item codes Item_Code_Avail instead of Item_Code (both in ResourceFile_Consumables_Items_and_Packages.csv). (What about the availability of items for which we do not have similar item we could approximate the availability on?)

I think this is sorted out with consumables module.

@EvaJanouskova
Copy link
Collaborator Author

To be able to use the default consumables availability, we need:

(2) Determine which items are essential.

So we need to only define which items are (not) essential.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants