Whatsdue: fixed to work with the new JAC system #207
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
GoldenRedstone
requested changes
Jul 24, 2024
|
Thanks for catching all of that. I completely forgot about the doc strings. |
GoldenRedstone
approved these changes
Jul 26, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Recently (semester 2 2024) UQ has changed their ECP management from ECPS to JAC. This means that many of the ECP related functions stopped working (as they were based off a old service started in 2006).
This PR rewrites most of these to work with the new system, letting
whatsduework again. There are some slight stylistic changes made to the output, due to certain links no longer being available, and the due dates for many courses actually being descriptions. ECPs from before sem 2 2024 will no longer be able to be processed, as these should no longer be needed.There might also be some future potential to include hurdle warnings in
whatsdue, as these are in the current ECP assessment tables, but are ignored in this PR.Please review harshly, as I have done a somewhat quick job at this.