Fix issues after fast task-restart #4
Conversation
|
SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.
|
maerki
force-pushed
the
bugfix/restart-datatask
branch
from
e9b1668 to
b80e8bb
Compare
WalkthroughThe recent updates refine privacy and error handling in UBFoundation's networking components. Access to Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- Sources/UBFoundation/Networking/UBURLDataTask.swift (2 hunks)
- Sources/UBFoundation/Networking/UBURLSession+Delegate.swift (3 hunks)
- Tests/UBFoundationTests/Networking/TaskAutoRefreshLogicTests.swift (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
Sources/UBFoundation/Networking/UBURLSession+Delegate.swift (1)
66-72: The change in the placement of thedeferblock ensures that resources are always cleaned up, which is a good practice.
| let initialResponse = try! BasicResponseProvider(rule: url.absoluteString, body: "Hello, World!", header: BasicResponseProvider.Header(statusCode: 200, headerFields: [ | ||
| "cache-control": "max-age=10000", | ||
| "etag": "0x8DB4542835F84A7", | ||
| "Date": UBBaseCachingLogic().dateFormatter.string(from: Date()), | ||
| ]), timing: .init(headerResponseDelay: 1, bodyResponseDelay: 1)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider handling potential errors from BasicResponseProvider initialization.
- let initialResponse = try! BasicResponseProvider(rule: url.absoluteString, body: "Hello, World!", header: BasicResponseProvider.Header(statusCode: 200, headerFields: [
+ let initialResponse = try? BasicResponseProvider(rule: url.absoluteString, body: "Hello, World!", header: BasicResponseProvider.Header(statusCode: 200, headerFields: [Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| let initialResponse = try! BasicResponseProvider(rule: url.absoluteString, body: "Hello, World!", header: BasicResponseProvider.Header(statusCode: 200, headerFields: [ | |
| "cache-control": "max-age=10000", | |
| "etag": "0x8DB4542835F84A7", | |
| "Date": UBBaseCachingLogic().dateFormatter.string(from: Date()), | |
| ]), timing: .init(headerResponseDelay: 1, bodyResponseDelay: 1)) | |
| let initialResponse = try? BasicResponseProvider(rule: url.absoluteString, body: "Hello, World!", header: BasicResponseProvider.Header(statusCode: 200, headerFields: [ | |
| "cache-control": "max-age=10000", | |
| "etag": "0x8DB4542835F84A7", | |
| "Date": UBBaseCachingLogic().dateFormatter.string(from: Date()), | |
| ]), timing: .init(headerResponseDelay: 1, bodyResponseDelay: 1)) |
| dataTask2.start() // start request again | ||
| wait(for: [ex2], timeout: 60) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Tip
Codebase Verification
The examination of the context around each occurrence of dataTask2.start() in various test files reveals that the pattern of starting the same request twice consecutively is indeed unique to the TaskAutoRefreshLogicTests.swift file. Other test files utilize dataTask2.start() but do not exhibit the same consecutive starting pattern.
Given this, the original review comment is valid. It is crucial to ensure that this behavior is intentional and appropriately documented to avoid potential race conditions or undefined behavior. Here are the specific findings:
- TaskAutoRefreshLogicTests.swift: Contains a unique test case where
dataTask2.start()is called twice consecutively, which is not observed in other test scenarios. - Other Test Files: Utilize
dataTask2.start()but in different contexts without the consecutive starting pattern.
It is recommended to verify the intention behind this test case and document the expected outcomes to clarify the purpose and expected behavior of the test.
Analysis chain
Starting the same request twice consecutively may lead to undefined behavior or race conditions. Please ensure this is the intended test behavior and document the expected outcomes.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the behavior of starting the same request twice in `testDoubleStart`.
# Test: Search for similar test patterns in other test files. Expect: No similar patterns indicating unique test case.
rg --type swift 'dataTask2.start()'
Length of output: 1002
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Examine the context around each occurrence of `dataTask2.start()` to determine if starting the same request twice consecutively is a common pattern.
# Extract 5 lines before and after each occurrence of `dataTask2.start()` in the mentioned files to understand the usage context.
rg --type swift -C 5 'dataTask2.start()' Tests/UBFoundationTests/Networking/TaskAutoRefreshLogicTests.swift
rg --type swift -C 5 'dataTask2.start()' Tests/UBFoundationTests/Networking/NetworkActivityTrackerTests.swift
rg --type swift -C 5 'dataTask2.start()' Tests/UBFoundationTests/Networking/TaskBaseCachingTests.swift
Length of output: 2909
| @@ -447,6 +447,7 @@ public final class UBURLDataTask: UBURLSessionTask, CustomStringConvertible, Cus | |||
| } | |||
| set { | |||
| stateDispatchQueue.sync { | |||
| print("new state", _state, newValue) | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider removing the debug print statement or replacing it with a proper logging mechanism before merging to production.
- print("new state", _state, newValue)Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
| print("new state", _state, newValue) |
maerki
force-pushed
the
bugfix/restart-datatask
branch
from
b80e8bb to
b8f5771
Compare
maerki
changed the title
maerki
requested review from
stmitt,
choli,
bastianmorath,
zenokoller,
zimmermannubique and
ubfelix
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- Sources/UBFoundation/Networking/UBURLDataTask.swift (2 hunks)
- Sources/UBFoundation/Networking/UBURLSession+Delegate.swift (6 hunks)
- Tests/UBFoundationTests/Networking/TaskAutoRefreshLogicTests.swift (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- Sources/UBFoundation/Networking/UBURLDataTask.swift
- Sources/UBFoundation/Networking/UBURLSession+Delegate.swift
- Tests/UBFoundationTests/Networking/TaskAutoRefreshLogicTests.swift
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review Details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- Sources/UBFoundation/Networking/UBURLDataTask.swift (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Sources/UBFoundation/Networking/UBURLDataTask.swift
Summary by CodeRabbit