Skip to content

Path selector quality analysis #214

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
m-petuhov opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Path selector quality analysis #214

m-petuhov opened this issue Jun 15, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
comp-summaries Something related to the method names, code comments and display names generation ctg-enhancement New feature, improvement or change request

Comments

@m-petuhov
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

Currently we have a lot of path selectors based on different heuristics, but there are no tools to analyze them

Context

A path selector is better relative to another in case it achieves the same or greater coverage in less time.

Idea

We want to implement statistics of coverage per time based on soot stmt's graph.

Implementation

We should develop:

  • Сollecting statistics
  • Parse statistics
  • Visualize statistics
@korifey korifey moved this to Todo in UTBot Java Jun 15, 2022
@amandelpie amandelpie self-assigned this Aug 22, 2022
@amandelpie amandelpie added the ctg-enhancement New feature, improvement or change request label Aug 22, 2022
@amandelpie amandelpie added this to the ML Path Selection. Phase I milestone Sep 14, 2022
@amandelpie amandelpie removed their assignment Jan 18, 2023
@alisevych alisevych added the comp-summaries Something related to the method names, code comments and display names generation label Apr 11, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
comp-summaries Something related to the method names, code comments and display names generation ctg-enhancement New feature, improvement or change request
Projects
Status: Todo
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants