Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed wrong assertions for lambda fields #1101

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 18, 2022
Merged

Conversation

Damtev
Copy link
Member

@Damtev Damtev commented Oct 5, 2022

Description

Some fixes for UtLambdaModel and restricted modules in concrete execution. Partly fixes #448.

Type of Change

Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

How Has This Been Tested?

Manual Scenario

Code mentioned in the issue with JDK 11

Checklist:

  • The change followed the style guidelines of the UTBot project
  • Self-review of the code is passed
  • The change contains enough commentaries, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • New documentation is provided or existed one is altered
  • No new warnings
  • All tests pass locally with my changes

@Damtev Damtev requested a review from CaelmBleidd October 5, 2022 13:56
@Damtev Damtev changed the title Damtev/lambda var example fix Fixed wrong assertions for lambda fields Oct 6, 2022
@Damtev Damtev force-pushed the damtev/lambda_var_example_fix branch from 7b166e6 to 93d8868 Compare October 18, 2022 02:19
@Damtev Damtev force-pushed the damtev/lambda_var_example_fix branch from 93d8868 to 772f9c1 Compare October 18, 2022 02:46
@Damtev Damtev merged commit fb0196e into main Oct 18, 2022
@Damtev Damtev deleted the damtev/lambda_var_example_fix branch October 18, 2022 04:33
@alisevych alisevych mentioned this pull request Oct 19, 2022
68 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Functional interfaces defined as class members - InaccessibleObjectException on test generation
2 participants