-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 45
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Field assertions fixes #920
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Damtev
added
ctg-bug
Issue is a bug
comp-codegen
Issue is related to code generator
labels
Sep 13, 2022
Damtev
force-pushed
the
damtev/field_assertions_fixes
branch
from
September 16, 2022 09:34
ab2fd98
to
4713374
Compare
Damtev
force-pushed
the
damtev/field_assertions_fixes
branch
2 times, most recently
from
October 7, 2022 10:17
b05acbb
to
a177d4c
Compare
Damtev
force-pushed
the
damtev/field_assertions_fixes
branch
from
October 7, 2022 13:23
a177d4c
to
130f598
Compare
EgorkaKulikov
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2022
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for fixing these problems.
AbdullinAM
pushed a commit
to AbdullinAM/UTBotJava
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2022
* Used real variable type after field access with reflection if possible * Added missing line separator after single-line block comment * Added missed initial field states for arrays * Removed field state assertions for failing tests
AbdullinAM
pushed a commit
to AbdullinAM/UTBotJava
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 17, 2022
* Used real variable type after field access with reflection if possible * Added missing line separator after single-line block comment * Added missed initial field states for arrays * Removed field state assertions for failing tests
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Fixes for several consecutive bugs with field assertions:
Also, added line separator after single-line block comment.
See corresponding tests behavior in Manual Testing section.
Type of Change
How Has This Been Tested?
Automated Testing
org.utbot.examples.codegen.modifiers.ClassWithPrivateMutableFieldOfPrivateTypeTest
Manual Scenario
Consider the following code:
and generate tests for the method
stringRegex
with the following settings:[Java, JUnit4, No mocks, 60s timeout, useConcreteExecution = true]
.Here the JUnit4 method
assertTrue
is invoked using reflection because of variablefinalStringRegexPatternCompiled
with typeObject
.But in this example this variable may be safely casted to its type
boolean
, and reflection usage for theassertTrue
usage would be redundant.So, expected code:
There are no assertions for
finalStringRegexPatternNamedGroups
andfinalStringRegexPatternGroupNodes
because they have array types and are filtered out from initial states by mistake.So, expected code is:
that contains assertions for these fields.
stringRegex.stringRegex(string);
.So, all these field assertions are redundant because they will never be invoked, and the last statement of this test method has to be MUT invocation.
Checklist (remove irrelevant options):