Skip to content

Conversation

urfeex
Copy link
Member

@urfeex urfeex commented May 6, 2025

This PR aims at providing the option to use an RTDE client READ-ONLY by providing an empty input recipe.

At this stage it is only an attempt to play around with that possibility, implementation details may change significantly.

Copy link

codecov bot commented May 6, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 93.75000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 77.95%. Comparing base (269b377) to head (4127006).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/rtde/rtde_client.cpp 83.33% 0 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #318      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   77.79%   77.95%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          92       92              
  Lines        4197     4209      +12     
  Branches      465      467       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         3265     3281      +16     
+ Misses        690      688       -2     
+ Partials      242      240       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
start_ursim 83.27% <ø> (-1.18%) ⬇️
ur20-latest 75.78% <93.75%> (+0.15%) ⬆️
ur5-3.14.3 76.35% <93.75%> (+0.25%) ⬆️
ur5e-10.7.0 71.47% <93.75%> (+0.17%) ⬆️
ur5e-5.9.4 76.29% <93.75%> (+0.15%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@urfeex urfeex force-pushed the rtde_client_read_only branch from 5d0ac76 to 4127006 Compare October 6, 2025 15:10
@urfeex urfeex marked this pull request as ready for review October 7, 2025 06:01
@urfeex urfeex added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 7, 2025
@urfeex urfeex requested a review from a team October 7, 2025 06:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant