-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix: Load stale data whenever there's any http error #130
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is correct. I don't believe PHP is ever going to do the HTTP 304 dance like the other SDKs and anything in the 500 range should be fine to get handled in the catch.
There's two 400 range HTTP status codes I want to clarify:
401 and 429. Do we want to raise error events in the dispatcher when the client is either being denied due to a bad token or rate limited by our infra? I want to say yes, just a sanity check that you've thought about it and agree
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
304 should be handled automatically and shouldn't be any issue.
429 seems like the perfect use-case for this, I'm a little conflicted on the 401, but ultimately I think that the SDK should try to fail as little as possible.
There is a time limit for the stale cache, meaning if the 401 prevails it will fail with an exception eventually, while temporary outages somewhere along the line (like some proxy having an outage) which could cause the 401 will be handled gracefully.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree with this.
Not critical, but should they body also be supplied in the exception message to help devs debug errors, in case it's available?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@eblanshey I don't think it would be useful given the exception is caught immediately so nothing ever propagates further. Or did you mean somewhere else?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Definitely don't think this should cause a failure, idly wondering about the value of being able to respond to a 401 with a hook. Don't think it's harmful to have though so yeah, looks good
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not related to this PR so maybe a conversation for a different time and place but is this what we want? My gut feel is the SDK raising an exception almost anywhere is surprising and not really handleable by the caller. Wouldn't mind unpacking this at some point (honestly I'd like a standard set of behaviours for our SDKs on this, which we don't really have right now)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The exception is passed to the
FetchingDataFailedEvent
, so I'd hook into that event to add a message to our logs. The body would help as much as the header code for context. For example, it could say "Incorrect API key", or "API key expired" or "Account banned", to name a few examples off the top of my head.But I see this was already merged so I guess we'll leave it at that.