Clarify educational purpose in README

[hari8118]

Added a note emphasizing the educational purpose of the project.

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Added a "⚠️ Educational Purpose Only" section to the README immediately after the license badge, including two blockquote paragraphs (a thank-you note and a reference with a link) plus an extra descriptive line about the full version's offerings. No runtime or behavioral changes were introduced.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

README.md: inserted a new "⚠️ Educational Purpose Only" section (two blockquote paragraphs plus a descriptive line) immediately after the license badge. No code, API, or behavior changes.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation update README.md	Added a new "⚠️ Educational Purpose Only" section after the license badge containing two blockquote paragraphs and an extra descriptive line linking to the full version.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

• Review scope: single documentation file, no logic to validate.

Poem

A rabbit nudges README bright,
Adds a caution in the light,
"Educational" it softly sings,
Guiding readers with small wings,
Hopping off with joyful bites. 🐇✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title 'Clarify educational purpose in README' directly and accurately summarizes the main change: adding a section to the README that emphasizes the project's educational purpose.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✨ Finishing touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 85242e4 and 4f3c83d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)

• README.md

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

README.md (1)

5-8: Good placement of educational disclaimer.

Adding the "⚠️ Educational Purpose Only" section early in the README is a responsible choice for a security-focused project. The language is clear and appropriately emphasizes responsible use and legal compliance.

Optional consideration: The content here overlaps somewhat with the "⚠️ Legal and Ethical Considerations" section later (lines 207–212). If you'd like to streamline the document, you could consolidate these into a single, more comprehensive disclaimer section placed early. This would eliminate redundancy while preserving the important messaging. However, the current approach of having the warning "above the fold" is also defensible and perhaps even preferable for user visibility.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0df3770 and 85242e4.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• README.md (1 hunks)

[TSCarterJr]

@hari8118 , please resolve the merge conflicts and update.

Thank you!