Update core.c #48
Closed
Update core.c #48
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ath10k: add ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_IGNORE_OTP_RESULT qca6174 otp binary seems to always return an error to the host, even if the calibration succeeded. Add a firmware feature flag to detect if the firmware image which have this problem and workaround the issue in ath10k by ignoring the error code. I was also considering making this hw specific flag but as this is strictly a firmware issue it's best to handle this via a firmware feature flag so that it will be easy to disable the workaround. Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com>
|
For some reason the pull request isn't accepted - but these WERE put into Update level 2.91. https://steamcommunity.com/groups/steamuniverse/discussions/1/350540780275787975/ |
johnv-valve
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 7, 2017
[ Upstream commit ddc665a ] When the instruction right before the branch destination is a 64 bit load immediate, we currently calculate the wrong jump offset in the ctx->offset[] array as we only account one instruction slot for the 64 bit load immediate although it uses two BPF instructions. Fix it up by setting the offset into the right slot after we incremented the index. Before (ldimm64 test 1): [...] 00000020: 52800007 mov w7, #0x0 // #0 00000024: d2800060 mov x0, #0x3 // #3 00000028: d2800041 mov x1, #0x2 // #2 0000002c: eb01001f cmp x0, x1 00000030: 54ffff82 b.cs 0x00000020 00000034: d29fffe7 mov x7, #0xffff // #65535 00000038: f2bfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #16 0000003c: f2dfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #32 00000040: f2ffffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #48 00000044: d29dddc7 mov x7, #0xeeee // #61166 00000048: f2bdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #16 0000004c: f2ddddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #32 00000050: f2fdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #48 [...] After (ldimm64 test 1): [...] 00000020: 52800007 mov w7, #0x0 // #0 00000024: d2800060 mov x0, #0x3 // #3 00000028: d2800041 mov x1, #0x2 // #2 0000002c: eb01001f cmp x0, x1 00000030: 540000a2 b.cs 0x00000044 00000034: d29fffe7 mov x7, #0xffff // #65535 00000038: f2bfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #16 0000003c: f2dfffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #32 00000040: f2ffffe7 movk x7, #0xffff, lsl #48 00000044: d29dddc7 mov x7, #0xeeee // #61166 00000048: f2bdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #16 0000004c: f2ddddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #32 00000050: f2fdddc7 movk x7, #0xeeee, lsl #48 [...] Also, add a couple of test cases to make sure JITs pass this test. Tested on Cavium ThunderX ARMv8. The added test cases all pass after the fix. Fixes: 8eee539 ("arm64: bpf: fix out-of-bounds read in bpf2a64_offset()") Reported-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: Xi Wang <xi.wang@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
johnv-valve
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2018
[ Upstream commit 36b6f9f ] Lockdep warns about a potential deadlock: [ 66.782842] ====================================================== [ 66.782888] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected [ 66.782937] 4.14.0-rc2-test-test+ #48 Not tainted [ 66.782983] ------------------------------------------------------ [ 66.783052] umount/336 is trying to acquire lock: [ 66.783117] (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}, at: [<ffffffff81032395>] rdt_kill_sb+0x215/0x390 [ 66.783193] but task is already holding lock: [ 66.783244] (rdtgroup_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810321b6>] rdt_kill_sb+0x36/0x390 [ 66.783305] which lock already depends on the new lock. [ 66.783364] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: [ 66.783419] -> #3 (rdtgroup_mutex){+.+.}: [ 66.783467] __lock_acquire+0x1293/0x13f0 [ 66.783509] lock_acquire+0xaf/0x220 [ 66.783543] __mutex_lock+0x71/0x9b0 [ 66.783575] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 66.783610] intel_rdt_online_cpu+0x3b/0x430 [ 66.783649] cpuhp_invoke_callback+0xab/0x8e0 [ 66.783687] cpuhp_thread_fun+0x7a/0x150 [ 66.783722] smpboot_thread_fn+0x1cc/0x270 [ 66.783764] kthread+0x16e/0x190 [ 66.783794] ret_from_fork+0x27/0x40 [ 66.783825] -> #2 (cpuhp_state){+.+.}: [ 66.783870] __lock_acquire+0x1293/0x13f0 [ 66.783906] lock_acquire+0xaf/0x220 [ 66.783938] cpuhp_issue_call+0x102/0x170 [ 66.783974] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x154/0x2a0 [ 66.784023] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xc7/0x170 [ 66.784061] page_writeback_init+0x43/0x67 [ 66.784097] pagecache_init+0x43/0x4a [ 66.784131] start_kernel+0x3ad/0x3f7 [ 66.784165] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c [ 66.784204] x86_64_start_kernel+0x72/0x75 [ 66.784241] verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb [ 66.784270] -> #1 (cpuhp_state_mutex){+.+.}: [ 66.784319] __lock_acquire+0x1293/0x13f0 [ 66.784355] lock_acquire+0xaf/0x220 [ 66.784387] __mutex_lock+0x71/0x9b0 [ 66.784419] mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 [ 66.784454] __cpuhp_setup_state_cpuslocked+0x52/0x2a0 [ 66.784497] __cpuhp_setup_state+0xc7/0x170 [ 66.784535] page_alloc_init+0x28/0x30 [ 66.784569] start_kernel+0x148/0x3f7 [ 66.784602] x86_64_start_reservations+0x2a/0x2c [ 66.784642] x86_64_start_kernel+0x72/0x75 [ 66.784678] verify_cpu+0x0/0xfb [ 66.784707] -> #0 (cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem){++++}: [ 66.784759] check_prev_add+0x32f/0x6e0 [ 66.784794] __lock_acquire+0x1293/0x13f0 [ 66.784830] lock_acquire+0xaf/0x220 [ 66.784863] cpus_read_lock+0x3d/0xb0 [ 66.784896] rdt_kill_sb+0x215/0x390 [ 66.784930] deactivate_locked_super+0x3e/0x70 [ 66.784968] deactivate_super+0x40/0x60 [ 66.785003] cleanup_mnt+0x3f/0x80 [ 66.785034] __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 [ 66.785070] task_work_run+0x8b/0xc0 [ 66.785103] exit_to_usermode_loop+0x94/0xa0 [ 66.786804] syscall_return_slowpath+0xe8/0x150 [ 66.788502] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0xab/0xad [ 66.790194] other info that might help us debug this: [ 66.795139] Chain exists of: cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem --> cpuhp_state --> rdtgroup_mutex [ 66.800035] Possible unsafe locking scenario: [ 66.803267] CPU0 CPU1 [ 66.804867] ---- ---- [ 66.806443] lock(rdtgroup_mutex); [ 66.808002] lock(cpuhp_state); [ 66.809565] lock(rdtgroup_mutex); [ 66.811110] lock(cpu_hotplug_lock.rw_sem); [ 66.812608] *** DEADLOCK *** [ 66.816983] 2 locks held by umount/336: [ 66.818418] #0: (&type->s_umount_key#35){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81229738>] deactivate_super+0x38/0x60 [ 66.819922] #1: (rdtgroup_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810321b6>] rdt_kill_sb+0x36/0x390 When the resctrl filesystem is unmounted the locks should be obtain in the locks in the same order as was done when the cpus came online: cpu_hotplug_lock before rdtgroup_mutex. This also requires to switch the static_branch_disable() calls to the _cpulocked variant because now cpu hotplug lock is held already. [ tglx: Switched to cpus_read_[un]lock ] Signed-off-by: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com> Acked-by: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com> Acked-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/cc292e76be073f7260604651711c47b09fd0dc81.1508490116.git.reinette.chatre@intel.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
ath10k: add ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_IGNORE_OTP_RESULT
qca6174 otp binary seems to always return an error to the host, even if the
calibration succeeded. Add a firmware feature flag to detect if the firmware
image which have this problem and workaround the issue in ath10k by ignoring
the error code.
I was also considering making this hw specific flag but as this is strictly a
firmware issue it's best to handle this via a firmware feature flag so that it
will be easy to disable the workaround.
Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo kvalo@qca.qualcomm.com