Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Adds a means to bypass fixed addresses for LibMulticaller #34

Conversation

3commascapital
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Describe the changes made in your pull request here.

Checklist

Ensure you completed all of the steps below before submitting your pull request:

  • Ran forge fmt?
  • Ran forge snapshot?
  • Ran forge test?

Pull requests with an incomplete checklist will be thrown out.

new feature ✨

@3commascapital
Copy link
Contributor Author

I find it a bit odd that the gas snapshot appears to be lower when i abstracted behind multiple internal calls. I do not understand why that is happening.

}
}

function getAt(address loc) internal view returns (address result) {
Copy link
Owner

@Vectorized Vectorized Apr 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'll rename to at(address a), resolve(address a) respectively, for mouthfeel.

@Vectorized Vectorized changed the title Adds a means to bypass fixed addresses ✨ Adds a means to bypass fixed addresses for LibMulticaller Apr 8, 2024
@Vectorized Vectorized changed the base branch from main to libmulticaller-enhancements April 8, 2024 17:05
@Vectorized Vectorized merged commit 0f94bba into Vectorized:libmulticaller-enhancements Apr 8, 2024
Vectorized added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 8, 2024
* ✨ Adds a means to bypass fixed addresses for LibMulticaller (#34)

Co-authored-by: 3commascapital <3commascapital@github.com>

* Tidy

---------

Co-authored-by: 3commascapital <90629478+3commascapital@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: 3commascapital <3commascapital@github.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants