Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade body-parser from 1.9.0 to 1.20.3 #118

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

VeronicaSnyk
Copy link
Owner

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade body-parser from 1.9.0 to 1.20.3.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 38 versions ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on 2 months ago.

Issues fixed by the recommended upgrade:

Issue Score Exploit Maturity
high severity Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
SNYK-JS-BODYPARSER-7926860
624 No Known Exploit
Release notes
Package name: body-parser
  • 1.20.3 - 2024-09-09

    What's Changed

    Important

    • deps: qs@6.13.0
    • add depth option to customize the depth level in the parser
    • IMPORTANT: The default depth level for parsing URL-encoded data is now 32 (previously was Infinity). Documentation

    Other changes

    New Contributors

    Full Changelog: 1.20.2...1.20.3

  • 1.20.2 - 2023-02-22
    • Fix strict json error message on Node.js 19+
    • deps: content-type@~1.0.5
      • perf: skip value escaping when unnecessary
    • deps: raw-body@2.5.2
  • 1.20.1 - 2022-10-06
    • deps: qs@6.11.0
    • perf: remove unnecessary object clone
  • 1.20.0 - 2022-04-03
    • Fix error message for json parse whitespace in strict
    • Fix internal error when inflated body exceeds limit
    • Prevent loss of async hooks context
    • Prevent hanging when request already read
    • deps: depd@2.0.0
      • Replace internal eval usage with Function constructor
      • Use instance methods on process to check for listeners
    • deps: http-errors@2.0.0
      • deps: depd@2.0.0
      • deps: statuses@2.0.1
    • deps: on-finished@2.4.1
    • deps: qs@6.10.3
    • deps: raw-body@2.5.1
      • deps: http-errors@2.0.0
  • 1.19.2 - 2022-02-16
    • deps: bytes@3.1.2
    • deps: qs@6.9.7
      • Fix handling of __proto__ keys
    • deps: raw-body@2.4.3
      • deps: bytes@3.1.2
  • 1.19.1 - 2021-12-10
  • 1.19.0 - 2019-04-26
  • 1.18.3 - 2018-05-14
  • 1.18.2 - 2017-09-22
  • 1.18.1 - 2017-09-12
  • 1.18.0 - 2017-09-09
  • 1.17.2 - 2017-05-18
  • 1.17.1 - 2017-03-06
  • 1.17.0 - 2017-03-01
  • 1.16.1 - 2017-02-11
  • 1.16.0 - 2017-01-18
  • 1.15.2 - 2016-06-20
  • 1.15.1 - 2016-05-06
  • 1.15.0 - 2016-02-11
  • 1.14.2 - 2015-12-16
  • 1.14.1 - 2015-09-28
  • 1.14.0 - 2015-09-16
  • 1.13.3 - 2015-07-31
  • 1.13.2 - 2015-07-06
  • 1.13.1 - 2015-06-16
  • 1.13.0 - 2015-06-15
  • 1.12.4 - 2015-05-11
  • 1.12.3 - 2015-04-16
  • 1.12.2 - 2015-03-17
  • 1.12.1 - 2015-03-16
  • 1.12.0 - 2015-02-14
  • 1.11.0 - 2015-01-31
  • 1.10.2 - 2015-01-21
  • 1.10.1 - 2015-01-02
  • 1.10.0 - 2014-12-03
  • 1.9.3 - 2014-11-22
  • 1.9.2 - 2014-10-28
  • 1.9.1 - 2014-10-23
  • 1.9.0 - 2014-09-24
from body-parser GitHub release notes

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade body-parser from 1.9.0 to 1.20.3.

See this package in npm:
body-parser

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/organization-name-tsd/project/1522a45c-0616-4171-a165-0eb71e5e4c27?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants