Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing methods in codegen #283

Closed
pawelprazak opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #320
Closed

Add missing methods in codegen #283

pawelprazak opened this issue Nov 10, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #320
Assignees
Labels
area/codegen Schema to code generator impact/broken Something that is difficult or impossible for some people to use kind/missing We are missing a part of functionality compared to upstream
Milestone

Comments

@pawelprazak
Copy link
Contributor

We are missing resource methods, the work should be done as a continuation of #279

@pawelprazak pawelprazak added impact/broken Something that is difficult or impossible for some people to use kind/missing We are missing a part of functionality compared to upstream area/codegen Schema to code generator labels Nov 10, 2023
@pawelprazak pawelprazak added this to the 0.2.0 milestone Nov 10, 2023
@pawelprazak pawelprazak self-assigned this Nov 10, 2023
pawelprazak added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2023
pawelprazak added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 12, 2023
pawelprazak added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2023
pawelprazak added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 2, 2023
pawelprazak added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2023
pawelprazak added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 4, 2023
* Add resource method generation to codegen

Fixes #283

* Update Package generation script
* Update CI files
* Address code review issues
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/codegen Schema to code generator impact/broken Something that is difficult or impossible for some people to use kind/missing We are missing a part of functionality compared to upstream
Projects
None yet
1 participant