Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(api): analysis: cost-surface: validate pu-ids #193

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 19, 2021

Conversation

kgajowy
Copy link
Contributor

@kgajowy kgajowy commented May 18, 2021

  • chore(api): analysis: move are-puuids-allowed to shared provider
  • feat(api): analysis: cost-surface: validate pu-ids

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented May 18, 2021

This pull request is being automatically deployed with Vercel (learn more).
To see the status of your deployments, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

marxan – ./app

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/vizzuality1/marxan/7ugWW2th8z9rjgd884makrVGGonZ
✅ Preview: https://marxan-git-feat-marxan-409-cost-surface-validate-95af75.vercel.app

marxan-storybook – ./app

🔍 Inspect: https://vercel.com/vizzuality1/marxan-storybook/5rhd1AT9ZzCt1xMQfMk4nK7TwB6U
✅ Preview: https://marxan-storybo-git-feat-marxan-409-cost-surface-validate-f4dcf9.vercel.app

@kgajowy kgajowy changed the title chore(api): analysis: move are-puuids-allowed to shared provider feat(api): analysis: cost-surface: validate pu-ids May 18, 2021
@kgajowy kgajowy marked this pull request as ready for review May 18, 2021 08:39
@kgajowy kgajowy requested review from hotzevzl, aagm, alexeh and Dyostiq May 18, 2021 08:39
Copy link
Member

@aagm aagm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

validation looks right, i will suggest merge

@kgajowy kgajowy merged commit fb5cf80 into develop May 19, 2021
@kgajowy kgajowy deleted the feat/MARXAN-409-cost-surface-validate-pu-id branch May 19, 2021 14:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants