Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added 'main' to 'commonality' parameter in the 'filter' function #386

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KingaMas
Copy link
Member

@KingaMas KingaMas commented Mar 7, 2025

Pull Request Template

Description

''commonality'' parameter now has one more predefined option ''main''. "main" selects the species with the highest occurrence for a given element. It was brought to my attention that there is an interest in finding the common specie for a given element and current thresholds didn't allow to do it easily as one threshold value was applied to all elements. Doesn't require extra dependencies.

Fixes # (issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • [ x] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

All tests finished successfuly.

Reviewers

@AntObi

Checklist

  • [x ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • [ x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • [ x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • [ x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • [ x] My changes generate no new warnings
  • [ x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • [ x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • [ x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • [ x] I have checked my code and corrected any misspellings

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Introduced a new "main" option in the filtering functionality, allowing direct selection of the species with the highest occurrence.
    • Updated related features and descriptions to ensure consistent use of the enhanced filtering option.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes update the ICSD24OxStatesFilter class in smact/utils/oxidation.py to accept a new valid option "main" for the commonality parameter. When "main" is specified, the filtering logic bypasses the standard threshold check, groups the DataFrame by "element", and selects the species with the maximum "species_proportion (%)". The updates also modify the parameter descriptions and error messages in the filter, get_species_list, and write methods.

Changes

File(s) Summary
smact/.../oxidation.py Updated ICSD24OxStatesFilter class: modified filter to handle a new "main" option for commonality (bypassing threshold checks and selecting max species), and updated get_species_list and write for consistent parameter descriptions and error messages.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant U as User
    participant F as ICSD24OxStatesFilter
    participant DB as DataFrame
    U->>F: Call filter(commonality)
    F->>F: Check value of commonality parameter
    alt commonality is "main"
        F->>DB: Group by "element"
        DB-->>F: Return max "species_proportion (%)"
    else commonality is "low/medium/high"
        F->>F: Apply standard threshold check
    end
    F-->>U: Return filtered DataFrame
Loading

Suggested labels

enhancement, docs

Poem

I’m a cheeky little rabbit, hopping through the code,
Finding juicy changes on this bright and busy road.
"Main" is now the route, where species prevail bright,
Carrots and code colliding in a pure delight.
With each new tweak, I bound with glee,
Celebrating change under our coding tree!
🐰🌟

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 7, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 57.14286% with 3 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.23%. Comparing base (e4ebdc0) to head (17c22e1).
Report is 81 commits behind head on develop.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
smact/utils/oxidation.py 57.14% 3 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #386      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    76.09%   76.23%   +0.14%     
===========================================
  Files           33       33              
  Lines         2786     2790       +4     
===========================================
+ Hits          2120     2127       +7     
+ Misses         666      663       -3     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
smact/utils/oxidation.py (1)

45-47: Consider more explicit handling of the 'main' option.

The use of pass makes the code less clear about what happens when commonality == "main". While the logic works because the actual handling is in the later conditional block, it would be more explicit to set a flag or variable here to indicate the special handling.

- if commonality == "main":
-     pass
- else:
-     commonality_threshold = commonality_map.get(commonality)
+ if commonality == "main":
+     commonality_threshold = None  # Indicate special handling
+ else:
+     commonality_threshold = commonality_map.get(commonality)

Also, this code path is flagged as not covered by tests. Consider adding test coverage for this new functionality.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 46-46: smact/utils/oxidation.py#L46
Added line #L46 was not covered by tests

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 542dda3 and 17c22e1.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • smact/utils/oxidation.py (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
smact/utils/oxidation.py

[warning] 46-46: smact/utils/oxidation.py#L46
Added line #L46 was not covered by tests


[warning] 52-52: smact/utils/oxidation.py#L52
Added line #L52 was not covered by tests


[warning] 67-67: smact/utils/oxidation.py#L67
Added line #L67 was not covered by tests

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.12, macos-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.11, windows-latest)
  • GitHub Check: test (3.10, windows-latest)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
smact/utils/oxidation.py (5)

37-37: Documentation correctly updated for the new 'main' option.

The docstring for the commonality parameter has been properly updated to include and explain the new "main" option, which clearly states that it "selects the species with the highest occurrence for a given element."


52-52: Error message correctly updated to include 'main' option.

The error message has been properly updated to include "main" in the list of valid string options for the commonality parameter.

Note: This line is flagged as not covered by tests. Consider adding tests for invalid parameter scenarios.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 52-52: smact/utils/oxidation.py#L52
Added line #L52 was not covered by tests


93-93: Documentation correctly updated in get_species_list method.

The docstring for the commonality parameter in the get_species_list method has been properly updated to include and explain the new "main" option.


170-170: Documentation correctly updated in write method.

The docstring for the commonality parameter in the write method has been properly updated to include and explain the new "main" option.


66-68: Consider handling potential issue with full dataset filtering.

When using commonality == "main", be aware that the implementation only selects rows with maximum "species_proportion (%)" per element, but doesn't retrieve the corresponding oxidation states. This could potentially lead to incorrect results as the complete row data isn't retained.

- filtered_df = filtered_df.groupby("element")["species_proportion (%)"].max().reset_index()
+ # Keep all columns and select rows with maximum species_proportion for each element
+ filtered_df = filtered_df.loc[filtered_df.groupby("element")["species_proportion (%)"].idxmax()].reset_index(drop=True)

Consider testing with real data to verify the current implementation produces the expected results.

🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 67-67: smact/utils/oxidation.py#L67
Added line #L67 was not covered by tests

Comment on lines +66 to +71
if commonality == "main":
filtered_df = filtered_df.groupby("element")["species_proportion (%)"].max().reset_index()
else:
filtered_df = filtered_df[filtered_df["species_proportion (%)"] >= commonality_threshold].reset_index(
drop=True
)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Verification agent

🧩 Analysis chain

Implementation of 'main' option needs test coverage.

The implementation logic for the "main" option correctly selects the species with the highest occurrence for a given element by:

  1. Grouping the DataFrame by "element"
  2. Finding the maximum "species_proportion (%)" for each element

However, this code path is flagged as not covered by tests. Ensure comprehensive test coverage for this new functionality to verify it works as expected across different scenarios.


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for tests related to the ICSD24OxStatesFilter.filter method with 'main' option
rg -A 10 -B 10 "commonality.*main" --glob "**/*.py" | grep -v "oxidation.py"

Length of output: 82


Action Required: Add Test Coverage for 'main' Option in oxidation.py

The recent search confirms that no tests currently address the 'main' option in the smact/utils/oxidation.py file. Please add comprehensive tests to verify that when commonality is "main", the logic correctly groups by "element" and selects the maximum "species_proportion (%)" for each group.

  • File: smact/utils/oxidation.py (Lines 66-71)
  • Action: Create tests covering various scenarios for the 'main' branch to ensure the grouping and max selection behaviour work as expected.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 67-67: smact/utils/oxidation.py#L67
Added line #L67 was not covered by tests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant