-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
When should our next Sync meeting be? #402
Comments
Do we have an expected timeline for finishing all of the prototypes? I'm going to be home for the holidays, so if I have some spare cycles, I can probably help benchmark other proposals too. |
I'm fine with meeting on Dec 18 |
There are a lot of moving parts, so I don't have a good overall picture. @ngzhian, do you have a sense of when V8 prototyping will be done for the outstanding instructions? (Or would you say it's done right now?) On the tools side, I aim to get up to parity with V8 within the next week. Another alternative meeting time (suggested by Deepti) would be the 22nd during the normal CG meeting slot, assuming the CG meeting is canceled, which looks likely. This is my favorite idea so far. |
I'm fine with meeting on the 18th, but we could also do the 14th or the 22nd - the 22nd pushes pretty close to the holidays, but as the CG meeting that day will most likely be cancelled it's possibly a slot that most people may have empty on their calendars. |
Oops, added a comment before the page updated, but what @tlively said. :) |
22nd works for me too :) |
I'm not working on the 22nd so won't be able to attend then (18th is my last day before the holidays). I don't think that's a good reason not to meet; I'm OK with reading the minutes. |
All these instructions have been prototyped for at least 1 arch on V8:
If I'm missing prototype on some opcodes please cc me on the issue so I get some visibility, thanks! |
And #395 |
I am off on 22nd as well, though I might dial in if I am going to be around my desk (cannot promise), I am also OK with reading the minutes later. I would like to eventually discuss #403, but we would definitely need larger group for that. |
Ok, lets save #403 for January, then. How about @Maratyszcza and I try to get as much benchmarking as possible by the 22nd for the instructions prototyped in V8 and we can focus that meeting on evaluating whether those newly benchmarked instructions should be included in the proposal. Would the folks who are going to be out on the 22nd (@lars-t-hansen, @penzn) be ok with that? |
Yes, with the exception of the prefetch instruction, which I am not in favor of at present. |
Same here, I think we should discuss prefetch with everybody present. |
Here are the notes from this morning's meeting. We had two provisional votes that achieved consensus: one to include the load/store lane instructions (#350) and one to include the i64x2 widening instructions (#290). Unless the folks who weren't in the meeting today have objections, we will merge these instructions after our next meeting. |
Friday, December 18 is a day off for Google
Friday, December 25 is Christmas
Friday, January 1 is New Years
Friday, January 8 is free but a long way away.
I propose that we next meet on January 8, but try to make progress online in the meantime. Specifically, we should aim to have benchmarking data for all of the outstanding proposals by the January 8th meeting. How does that sound to everyone?
cc @lars-t-hansen @arunetm @abrown @Maratyszcza @omnisip @dtig @rrwinterton
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: