Skip to content

Spell out the expected plans for a WebAssembly spec. #285

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2016
Merged

Conversation

sunfishcode
Copy link
Member

I've received some questions about the status of the spec and the plans going forward. This PR briefly documents ideas that have been around, but not yet written down anywhere.

@rossberg
Copy link
Member

lgtm

@lukewagner
Copy link
Member

lgtm too

@sunfishcode sunfishcode merged commit 790b699 into master May 13, 2016
@jfbastien jfbastien deleted the spec-plans branch May 14, 2016 17:17
ngzhian added a commit to ngzhian/spec that referenced this pull request Nov 4, 2021
rossberg added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 28, 2024
* Reintroduce exnref

* Fix type_of

* Simplify parser

* Implement 1b

* Change opcodes for catch/catch_all to avoid conflict

* Put catch clauses first

* Remove obsolete Delegating cases

* Change exn type opcode to -0x17

* Switch to B' variant

* [interpreter] Add boilerplate for ref.exn result patterns

* [ci] Deactivate node run, since it can't handle try_table yet

* Try -> TryTable in AST

* [spec] Update spec for option B' (#283)

* Deactivate Bikeshed

* [spec/tests] Specification of legacy exceptions + tests (#284)

* [legacy] Create specification doc for legacy exception handling

* [test] Create infra for legacy tests
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants