Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fraction of tumour cells > 1? #25

Open
amootta opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 2 comments
Open

Fraction of tumour cells > 1? #25

amootta opened this issue Dec 20, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@amootta
Copy link

amootta commented Dec 20, 2023

Hi there,
Thanks very much for making this very useful package.
I have a query about the results I am getting from dpclust. It has successfully run on one of my samples, with input that was pre-processed from Battenberg calls. However, I am just looking at the plot and it is showing me that there are mutations clustering with Fraction of Tumor Cells greater than 1. I am not sure what this means and if this means that there is a mistake in the calculation somewhere?
1_DirichletProcessplot_with_cluster_locations_2

Thanks very much

@davidwedge
Copy link
Member

Hi @amootta, thanks for your query. We don't restrict DPClust to call clusters with a CCF between 0 and 1, as individual mutations can have an apparent CCF higher than 1 due to random sampling of mutant and WT DNA fragments. This means that we can have a clonal cluster called with a CCF slightly above (or slightly below) 1. CCF estimates are likely to be less accurate for samples sequenced to lower depths, of low purity or with few mutations. From the figure, I don't know what sequencing depth or purity your sample had, but it appears to have a small number of mutations - is this WGS or WES?

@amootta
Copy link
Author

amootta commented Feb 5, 2024

Hi @davidwedge
Thanks so much for getting back to me and for the explanation. You are right that it is from WGS - what is the minimum sequencing depth recommended? Apologies if I missed this information somewhere else. Would you recommend that I still use this software for WGS? Thanks again.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants