-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix NLCD codes. #32
Fix NLCD codes. #32
Conversation
'short_grass_prairie': {'nlcd': 95, 'ki': 1, 'cn': {'a': 98, 'b': 98, 'c': 98, 'd': 98}}, # noqa | ||
'desert': {'nlcd': 95, 'ki': 1, 'cn': {'a': 98, 'b': 98, 'c': 98, 'd': 98}}, # noqa | ||
'chaparral': {'nlcd': 52, 'ki': 1, 'cn': {'a': 35, 'b': 56, 'c': 70, 'd': 77}}, # noqa | ||
'tall_grass_prairie': {'nlcd': 85, 'ki': 0.6, 'cn': {'a': 35, 'b': 56, 'c': 70, 'd': 77}}, # noqa XXX |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is this XXX
indicative of something outstanding to do?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, I could not find find solid numbers for type 85. I used the ki from short grass and the curve numbers from "brush in fair condition". I also used similarly imputed event mean concentrations.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Got it, let's make a corresponding issue for those then.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I figured that these cannot be worse than the present values, which are all copies of herbaceous wetland.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Okay, will-do.
In [1], Tallgrass Prairie maps to Urban/Recreational Grasses which I thought would be code 21 (not 85), since |
According to the 1992 classification scheme, 85 is Urban/Recreational Grasses and 21 is Low Intensity Residential. I will double-check. |
Our eventual land cover data set will be the NLCD 2011, so prefer that over 1992 classifications if there is a discrepancy. |
I think we may have a few minor issues. According to http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_leg.php , 21 is undeveloped open space, which does sound like a good analogue for urban grass. If that is the case, then code 85 might be undefined. |
In any case, if we are using the 2011 scheme, I think that tall grass needs to be 21 and I also need to make another change to the simple app mapping that to 21 instead of 85. |
Thanks for looking carefully, I appreciate it. Is this consistent with your understanding? |
Yes, looks good. |
Okay, I appreciate it. |
Some NLCD codes were incorrect. "Short grass" is of type 81 [1], "chaparral" is of type 52 [2], "desert" is of type 31 [2], and "tall grass" is of type 21 [1]. [1] http://www.asprs.org/a/publications/pers/2003journal/december/2003_dec_1387-1397.pdf p. 1389 [2] http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_leg.php
Some NLCD codes were incorrect. "Short grass" is of type 81 [1], "chaparral" is of type 52 [2], "desert" is of type 31 [2], and "tall grass" is of type 21 [1].
[1] http://www.asprs.org/a/publications/pers/2003journal/december/2003_dec_1387-1397.pdf p. 1389
[2] http://www.mrlc.gov/nlcd11_leg.php