Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update JSDoc #13742

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2019
Merged

Update JSDoc #13742

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2019

Conversation

oandregal
Copy link
Member

Update JSDoc comment for concat function.

@oandregal oandregal self-assigned this Feb 7, 2019
@oandregal oandregal added [Type] Developer Documentation Documentation for developers [Feature] Rich Text Related to the Rich Text component that allows developers to render a contenteditable labels Feb 7, 2019
@oandregal oandregal added this to the Documentation & Handbook milestone Feb 7, 2019
@ellatrix
Copy link
Member

ellatrix commented Feb 7, 2019

Is this part of a systematic check of all documentation for RichText?

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ import { normaliseFormats } from './normalise-formats';
* Combine all Rich Text values into one. This is similar to
* `String.prototype.concat`.
*
* @param {...[object]} values An array of all values to combine.
* @param {...Object} values Objects to combine.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought I'd seen the removed syntax around... The one you're suggesting seems correct but it's a bit weird to me. values is an array, not an object?

Copy link
Member Author

@oandregal oandregal Feb 7, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm working on generating documentation (markdown, html) from the JSDoc comments and this one didn't pass my tests. I didn't find this way of param type declaration in the standard.

I thought it took objects as input? As in concat( object1, object2, object3 );. That is what is implied in the tests. concat converts that input into an array, though:

export function concat( ...values ) { }

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Changes as proposed seem correct to me. If it receives variadic arguments, it should be a ... prefix on the type expected.

From your link, see under "Variable number of that type". The main difference is ES2015+ adds syntax support for the spread argument.

Related:

@oandregal oandregal merged commit 6ae4ddd into master Feb 8, 2019
@oandregal oandregal deleted the update/jsdoc-concat branch February 8, 2019 08:05
youknowriad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2019
youknowriad pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 6, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
[Feature] Rich Text Related to the Rich Text component that allows developers to render a contenteditable [Type] Developer Documentation Documentation for developers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants