Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[WIP] BlockList: refactoring class-based component into functional one. #15934

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

[WIP] BlockList: refactoring class-based component into functional one. #15934

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

nicolad
Copy link
Member

@nicolad nicolad commented May 31, 2019

Description

How has this been tested?

Screenshots

Types of changes

Checklist:

  • My code is tested.
  • My code follows the WordPress code style.
  • My code follows the accessibility standards.
  • My code has proper inline documentation.
  • I've included developer documentation if appropriate.

@nicolad nicolad added [Type] Performance Related to performance efforts [Type] Code Quality Issues or PRs that relate to code quality labels May 31, 2019
@nicolad nicolad requested a review from youknowriad May 31, 2019 07:56
@nicolad nicolad self-assigned this May 31, 2019
@nicolad nicolad mentioned this pull request May 31, 2019
Merged
@nicolad nicolad added the [Priority] Low Used to indicate that the issue at hand isn't a top priority to address and can be handled later label Jun 16, 2019
@nicolad nicolad closed this Jul 8, 2019
@nicolad nicolad deleted the refactor/block-list-class-to-functional-swap branch July 8, 2019 07:19
@nicolad nicolad removed their assignment Sep 29, 2019
@nicolad nicolad added the [Status] Not Implemented Issue/PR we will (likely) not implement. label Aug 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@youknowriad youknowriad Awaiting requested review from youknowriad

@ellatrix ellatrix Awaiting requested review from ellatrix

@gziolo gziolo Awaiting requested review from gziolo

@talldan talldan Awaiting requested review from talldan

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
[Priority] Low Used to indicate that the issue at hand isn't a top priority to address and can be handled later [Status] Not Implemented Issue/PR we will (likely) not implement. [Type] Code Quality Issues or PRs that relate to code quality [Type] Performance Related to performance efforts
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@nicolad