Another experiment for block variations - No reviews please :) #27407
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Size Change: +240 B (0%) Total Size: 1.19 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
|
@ntsekouras This reminds me of a discussion some of us had about the legacy widget block. That block is similar to embeds in that it has variations for the different types of widgets represented. A subset of widgets are 'reference widgets', which can only be used once in a 'post'. The challenge was making the block supports This is the issue - #25494 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Quick prototype for expanding the Blocks API to try to find a matched block variation to show the appropriate display properties. You can test it with
social iconsandembeds.I made some quick changes to
Block Card,Transforms icon(in toolbar), andNavigation list view(top bar).