Mark core blocks as stable or experimental in block json #40647
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
adamziel
requested review from
michalczaplinski,
tellthemachines,
mkaz,
geriux and
ajitbohra
as code owners
adamziel
changed the title
adamziel
changed the title
adamziel
added
the
Developer Experience
adamziel
changed the title
|
Size Change: -6.63 kB (-1%) Total Size: 1.22 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
gziolo
added
[Status] In Progress
adamziel
force-pushed
the
try/mark-blocks-as-experimental-in-block-json
branch
from
1f7cee6
to
c8d3119
Compare
…ime in CLI and extract the information about blocks
adamziel
requested review from
gziolo,
ntwb,
nerrad and
ryanwelcher
as code owners
|
Closing in favor of #40655 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
🚧 Work in Progress 🚧
An attempt to declaratively communicate which blocks are stable and which aren't.
The goal: Automate the WordPress release process. Right now, the build script doesn't know which blocks should be included which makes syncing blocks a manual process.
For now I'm just waiting for the CI to pass or not.
cc @gziolo