Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Template Parts: allow selection in page content focus mode #60010
Template Parts: allow selection in page content focus mode #60010
Changes from 3 commits
66ebb55
0e26813
84c2428
e1e6b51
ebfdca1
34e9348
348889e
6b05cb4
120c785
c542396
27962d0
19516d7
b0b35da
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not specific to this PR but I see this component as a hack. Also the
setBlockEditingMode
anduseBlockEditingMode
APIs have proven to be problematic in a lot of ways. Multiple conflicts and race conditions, I'd love to absorb these in the block editor framework/package instead (maybe through a setting or something) but we'd need to think properly about the API that we'd want to provide there.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah agreed and I keep running into limitations too. For example in this PR I want to disable insertion but not selection on the Template Part and disable all of its children.
contentOnly
doesn't really cut it for the former. There were similar issues with synced patterns.We also have lots of ways to do similar things. I feel that with the right abstraction we could unify
tempateLock
, thelock
attribute, andsetBlockEditingMode
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I prefer templateLock instead because it's declarative while setBlockEditingMode is more subject to race conditions. I think the framework should be able to "guess" the mode, rather the consumer providing it for each block.