-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use the breadcrumb as the draggable handle #8764
Conversation
9a06f5d
to
c5e55f8
Compare
I would like it if the block controls doubled as drag handles. That would provide a way to drag the selected block. Noting that the outcome of #6224 may make this redundant and remove the need for it, but until then, I think this is a good improvement over master. I really dislike the current invisible drag handles. |
c5e55f8
to
a9dc4ae
Compare
a9dc4ae implements a proof of concept for the draggable indicator using dashicons |
a9dc4ae
to
fbd9d0d
Compare
@@ -15,12 +15,13 @@ export default class Dashicon extends Component { | |||
return ( | |||
this.props.icon !== nextProps.icon || | |||
this.props.size !== nextProps.size || | |||
this.props.viewBox !== nextProps.viewBox || |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These changes to the dashicon component is an interim hack. We need to either port them to upstream dashicon repo if they make sense or figure out a different approach to show the drag affordance to the user.
@@ -985,6 +908,10 @@ | |||
.editor-block-list__block:hover & { | |||
@include fade_in(0.1s); | |||
} | |||
|
|||
.editor-block-list__breadcrumb-drag-handle { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is part of the dashicon hack to show a drag affordance to user. See https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/pull/8764/files#r210868679
@@ -95,7 +24,7 @@ | |||
.editor-block-list__block { | |||
&.is-hidden *, | |||
&.is-hidden > * { | |||
visibility: hidden; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Previous to this PR, the block's contents were hidden and a grey box was made visible on top of them instead. That grey box was a div
element created by the Draggable
and BlockDraggable
components. If we want to keep that pattern we'll need to figure out something for this as we no longer have a separate DOM component as the drag handle.
Lowering the opacity of the content being dragged is also a nice pattern other apps use and helps in identifying what's being dragged.
So we don't need these.
The drag handle no longer overlaps the block content div, so we can't render a placeholder in the handle itself. We need to figure somethingelse out.
This tweaks the dashicon viewBox to render a not too embarrasing draggable indicator. This needs fixing.
Previous to this refactor, it used to be a div inside the block wrapper that would become visible when the block was being dragged. That div would appear as grey. By refactoring the drag handler to the breadcrumb we no longer have that div, so we seek to use a different technique to communicate the same behavior. I also think is nicer to show the original content.
it's only used internally by the block-list component.
The new name clarifies the purpose and allows the original component to have passed the onDragStart property by some parent component.
157cb2c
to
7c37b06
Compare
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ $z-layers: ( | |||
".editor-block-list__block {core/image aligned left or right}": 20, | |||
".editor-block-list__block {core/image aligned wide or fullwide}": 20, | |||
".freeform-toolbar": 10, | |||
".editor-block-list__breadcrumb": 1, | |||
".editor-block-list__breadcrumb": 1000000000, // used as a drag handler, we want it to be shown above the entire UI |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
9999a4f fixes the problem with the popover.
@@ -394,7 +393,7 @@ export class BlockListBlock extends Component { | |||
// We render block movers and block settings to keep them tabbale even if hidden | |||
const shouldRenderMovers = ( isSelected || hoverArea === 'left' ) && ! showEmptyBlockSideInserter && ! isMultiSelecting && ! isPartOfMultiSelection && ! isTypingWithinBlock; | |||
const shouldRenderBlockSettings = ( isSelected || hoverArea === 'right' ) && ! isMultiSelecting && ! isPartOfMultiSelection; | |||
const shouldShowBreadcrumb = isHovered && ! isEmptyDefaultBlock; | |||
const shouldShowBreadcrumb = ( isSelected || isHovered ) && ! isEmptyDefaultBlock; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is a bad idea. Nothing should ever constantly overlap the content of the selected block. It is bad enough that sibling inserters currently do this; see #8206, #8881, and #8883.
If the hover label was shown outside of the block border, then I think this would be fine. Of course, that would conflict with the toolbar. I think that dragging a selected block should be done from empty space in the toolbar (or just dragging from anywhere in the toolbar, similar to what GNOME does), and/or dragging from the up/down movers on the side.
See also:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This PR is at a point where it's functional and needs design review, that's indeed one of the things we need to discuss and iterate on. I've pinged @jasmussen for that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Just want to note I'm also pretty uncomfortable with the handle being visible when the block is selected. Feels like additional weight in the UI.
@jasmussen would love your feedback on the open questions, design/interaction wise. #9074 may be potentially related (I commented there as well). @youknowriad @aduth I saw you were the Gutenberg core reviewers in #4115, the PR that first implemented drag and drop. I would appreciate any thoughts you may have on this PR's direction and the |
const cloneHeightTransformationBreakpoint = 700; | ||
const clonePadding = 20; | ||
|
||
const withDraggable = createHigherOrderComponent( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, this component ports the existing Draggable
functionality (set data transfer and create a drag image).
Noting that #9197 is related as it affects the hover label. |
Nice work! Thank you for working on this. Here's a GIF, that's always helpful: The good:
What we need to work out:
I'm personally of the opinion that drag and drop is very nice for a few things, like reordering items in a ToDo list, but for larger operations it's super fiddly and prone to error. For that specific reason I'm personally totally fine with drag and drop being purely a power-user feature that isn't made particularly visible by drag handles or affordances when a block is selected. But the hover/select issue is nonetheless something to think about. Flagging @karmatosed and @mtias for thougths here. Should we make the up/down movers double as dragondrop handles? Are there other solutions? |
This is the existing behavior on Gutenberg master as well. The reason is: the drop behavior is part of the block logic. And because you can drop a block above or below any other existing one, when you are dropping between blocks you'll have two spots: the below drop spot of one block, and the above drop spot of the next one. Edit: there is a potential fix that keeps the logic at the block level. We'd need to modify the drop zone behavior to only offer the spot below the block by default. It'd show the spot on top of the block if it is the first one (I assume we can know this by the block |
Ah, thanks for clarifying. This seems worth it for us to fix separately. But yes definitely out of scope for this PR. |
I am definitely in favor of making the up/down movers double as drag-and-drop handles. The block toolbar could also double as a drag handle. GNOME does this with its header bars and I think it works quite well. |
Closing this in favor of a more step-by-step process. The first step is to refactor how drag-n-drop works internally without changing the external behavior, see #9311 When that PR lands we can discuss in a separate PR what element(s) should become the new drag handle(s). That also buy us some time to fix some existing drop behaviors in parallel, and explore/consolidate changes to UI that are being discussed in other PRs (and affect to dnd behavior). |
This PR aims to address #7114
It introduces a new
withDraggable
component that decouples the drag handle (in this example, the breadcrumb/hover label) from the element being dragged (in this example, the block). Unlike the existingDraggable
component,withDraggable
is not concerned with creating a DOM node that serves as drag handle; it's the wrapped component responsibility to do so, which makeswithDraggable
reusable in several use cases.An example of how to use it:
initDragging
prop exposed by thewithDraggable
HOC with the DOM id of the element to drag and the necessary transfer data.Current status / Open questions
withDraggable
component in that particular case:TODO
Add back a placeholder in the block that is being dragged. Because the handle is no longer overlapped with the block content, we need a replacement for this (we used to make the draggable area visible as a placeholder when detecting that it was being dragged).Make the breadcrumb and the draggable component areas equal. At the moment they're separated entities, use the draggable to wrap the breadcrumb. If we keep them separated, we could render the breadcrumb text also in the draggable component, to make the area equal.Separate the drag handler from the logic to add a drag image and setting the drag data.Adjust z-index to prevent the breadcrumb from showing on top of popovers.Test
Drag and drop a block and test that it works as used to be. Specifically test: embeds (or anything with iframes), nested blocks.