Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
backport Rename Reusable blocks to Patterns #4646
backport Rename Reusable blocks to Patterns #4646
Changes from 14 commits
daeb820
4c0252a
30d7fad
531eacb
1c4ebfc
2dcc313
4fdf7fb
615e369
f50707b
82226cc
4a1dcf3
acc702f
49fea36
e5919fb
5d9e2de
e2b0ec5
53337c7
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I was going to say this one could have a
@since 6.3.0
note too, but then I checked thecreate_initial_post_types
doc block and there were no additions of the sort for previous changes, so I guess we might as well be consistent and leave it out 😅There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is custom fields support actually needed?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
In my testing the postmeta sync_status field was not returned without this.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We are however going to look at returning it via REST as a top-level
sync_status
field rather than as post meta so we may be able to drop custom fields support if we go that way.