Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade ethers from 5.7.1 to 5.7.2 #25

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-candidate
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

X-oss-byte
Copy link
Owner

This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.


Snyk has created this PR to upgrade ethers from 5.7.1 to 5.7.2.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.
  • The recommended version was released a year ago, on 2022-10-19.
Release notes
Package name: ethers
  • 5.7.2 - 2022-10-19
  • 5.7.1 - 2022-09-14
from ethers GitHub release notes
Commit messages
Package name: ethers
  • 60248f3 admin: update dist files
  • f5abaaf admin: add environment to CI
  • 1392803 Updated tests to use goerli instead of ropsten.
  • 9f990c5 Added new error strings Pocket returns.
  • 74e3d98 Fixed Alchemy goerli URL. (#3320, #3323, #3340, #3358, #3423)
  • 8745800 admin: update dist files
  • 2a3a2e1 Update testnets for third-party providers (#3320, #3323, #3340, #3358, #3423).

Compare


Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

🧐 View latest project report

🛠 Adjust upgrade PR settings

🔕 Ignore this dependency or unsubscribe from future upgrade PRs

Copy link

stackblitz bot commented Feb 8, 2024

Review PR in StackBlitz Codeflow Run & review this pull request in StackBlitz Codeflow.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Feb 8, 2024

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 82f06f1

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR Type: Enhancement

PR Summary: This pull request updates the ethers package from version 5.7.1 to 5.7.2. It was automatically created by Snyk to keep the project's dependencies up-to-date, ensuring that vulnerabilities are fixed and that the project benefits from the latest features and improvements in the ethers package.

Decision: Comment

📝 Type: 'Enhancement' - not supported yet.
  • Sourcery currently only approves 'Typo fix' PRs.
✅ Issue addressed: this change correctly addresses the issue or implements the desired feature.
No details provided.
✅ Small diff: the diff is small enough to approve with confidence.
No details provided.

General suggestions:

  • Ensure that the project's documentation reflects this dependency update, especially if there are any breaking changes or new features that could affect the project's functionality.
  • Consider performing a thorough testing of the project's features that rely on the ethers package to ensure that the update does not introduce any regressions.
  • Review the release notes and commit messages linked in the PR description to understand the changes included in ethers version 5.7.2 and assess their impact on the project.

Thanks for using Sourcery. We offer it for free for open source projects and would be very grateful if you could help us grow. If you like it, would you consider sharing Sourcery on your favourite social media? ✨

Share Sourcery

Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants