- Identify the different international PA programmes and present the most relevant
- Identify gaps in the management of sites that are identified as sites important for BFA (KBFA perhaps?)
- Identify species on The Red List which are utilized for food
- Run a gap analyses to establish what percentage of the range of species utilized for food or classed as BFA is cover by PAs and which species are gap (i.e., not covered by PAs)
- Highlight observed contributions of PAs to BFA and identify potentials / gaps
- Assess contribution of (extensive) agricultural management on wild species conservation, and linkages between wild biodiversity-BFA
- In the analysis, distinguish the impact/importance of PA’s contributions to BFA by type (of protection)
- Create consistency between analysis and conclusion Depth of analysis depends on available funds: descriptive from literature / survey or GIS analysis for specific sites
- Analyze the degree of human intervention and farmers’/ livestock keepers rights to farm or to access collective land/ pasture in the various forms of PA
- Provide an analysis of, and recommendations about the observed contribution of PAs to BFA; highlight if and how the different PA programmes contribute to the conservation and sustainable use of BFA; highlight if, how and in what case these contributions are specifically valued / mentioned in the statutes.
- Specific/different contributions observed for crop, livestock, forest and aquatic species, soil biodiversity, pollinators etc. at global level, synergies or trade-offs.
- Compare the theory at global level and the reality of practitioners.
- Identify main success stories and any known challenges (only mention challenges if somehow internationally agreed or published in recognized literature).
- Identify which (low level/intensive) agricultural practice is beneficial for the conservation and sustainable use of BFA