-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Off-by-one error in testnet minimum difficulty block gap specification #1276
Labels
A-docs
Area: Documentation
NU-1 Sapling
Network Upgrade: Sapling specific tasks
NU-2 Blossom
Network Upgrade: Blossom specific tasks
S-needs-spec-update
Status: Not in the Zcash spec, but it should be
Milestone
Comments
teor2345
added
A-docs
Area: Documentation
NU-1 Sapling
Network Upgrade: Sapling specific tasks
S-needs-spec-update
Status: Not in the Zcash spec, but it should be
NU-2 Blossom
Network Upgrade: Blossom specific tasks
labels
Nov 10, 2020
daira
added a commit
to zcash/zips
that referenced
this issue
Nov 10, 2020
…ks matches zcashd. Fixes ZcashFoundation/zebra#1276 . Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
Done 🙏 |
We missed a
zcash/zips@806076c#diff-3f875a100a287c2b47ce389870bdde636f2720429dc19a74d1b42b4e08e31962R187 |
Thanks, I'll include this in zcash/zips#417. |
daira
added a commit
to zcash/zips
that referenced
this issue
Nov 12, 2020
Signed-off-by: Daira Hopwood <daira@jacaranda.org>
teor2345
added a commit
to teor2345/zebra
that referenced
this issue
Nov 12, 2020
Update the design based on the spec bugs in ZcashFoundation#1276, ZcashFoundation#1277, and zcash/zips#416. These changes make the difficulty filter into a context-free check, so we remove it from this contextual validation RFC.
FIxed in zcash/zips#417. |
@teor2345 Can we close this one now? |
teor2345
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Nov 26, 2020
* Difficulty Contextual RFC: Introduction Add a header, summary, and motivation * Difficulty RFC: Add draft definitions And update the state RFC definitions to match. * Difficulty RFC: Add relevant chain * Difficulty RFC: draft guide-level explanation Outline the core calculations and checks. * Difficulty RFC: Revised based on spec fixes Update the design based on the spec bugs in #1276, #1277, and zcash/zips#416. These changes make the difficulty filter into a context-free check, so we remove it from this contextual validation RFC. * Difficulty RFC: Explain how Zebra's calculations can match the spec * Difficulty RFC: write most of the reference section Includes most of the implementation, modules for each function, and draft notes for some of the remaining parts of the RFC. * Difficulty RFC: Add an AdjustedDifficulty struct * Difficulty RFC: Summarise module structure in the one place * Difficulty RFC: Create implementation notes subsections * Difficulty RFC: add consensus critical order of operations * Difficulty RFC: Use the ValidateContextError type * Difficulty RFC: make the median_time arg mut owned We have to clone the data to pass a fixed-length array to a function, so we might as well sort that array to find the median, and avoid a copy.
6 tasks
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
A-docs
Area: Documentation
NU-1 Sapling
Network Upgrade: Sapling specific tasks
NU-2 Blossom
Network Upgrade: Blossom specific tasks
S-needs-spec-update
Status: Not in the Zcash spec, but it should be
Issue
The minimum difficulty block gap check is ambiguous in ZIP-205 and ZIP-208.
zcashd
uses a strictly greater than check.Details
zcashd implements the minimum difficulty block gap using a strictly greater than test:
https://github.com/zcash/zcash/blob/514d86817990a1bf9578ee5fa2d01c34c6ca6035/src/pow.cpp#L33
But ZIP-205 specifies greater than or equal to:
And ZIP-208 is ambiguous:
https://zips.z.cash/zip-0208#minimum-difficulty-blocks-on-the-test-network
Suggested Resolution
@dconnolly or @daira, can you update ZIP-205 and ZIP-208 to consistently say
exceeds
orgreater than
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: