Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create clang-format workflow #390

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 15, 2024

Conversation

sbaldu
Copy link
Collaborator

@sbaldu sbaldu commented Jan 12, 2024

Add a workflow that checks the formatting of C++ files.
I use this workflow in other projects and I thought that it might be useful.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Jan 12, 2024

👇 Click on the image for a new way to code review

Review these changes using an interactive CodeSee Map

Legend

CodeSee Map legend

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (1fdcff9) 97.54% compared to head (60a80d3) 97.55%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #390      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.54%   97.55%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          85       85              
  Lines        9357     9367      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits         9127     9138      +11     
+ Misses        230      229       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.55% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@sbaldu sbaldu requested review from nrkramer and ZigRazor January 12, 2024 16:19
@ZigRazor ZigRazor merged commit 92a8ea5 into ZigRazor:master Jan 15, 2024
29 of 33 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants