Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[*] dependent works are not executed when the preceding work is cancelled #72

Conversation

ZjzMisaka
Copy link
Owner

No description provided.

@ZjzMisaka ZjzMisaka added the bug Something isn't working label Nov 12, 2024
@ZjzMisaka ZjzMisaka self-assigned this Nov 12, 2024
Copy link
Owner Author

@ZjzMisaka ZjzMisaka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

self checked

@ZjzMisaka ZjzMisaka merged commit 470919c into main Nov 12, 2024
4 of 6 checks passed
@ZjzMisaka ZjzMisaka deleted the dependent-works-are-not-executed-when-the-preceding-work-is-cancelled branch November 12, 2024 17:56
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.87%. Comparing base (ebbc735) to head (c984189).
Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #72   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.87%   99.87%           
=======================================
  Files          36       36           
  Lines        2335     2346   +11     
  Branches      276      278    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits         2332     2343   +11     
  Misses          2        2           
  Partials        1        1           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant