FEATURE - Improving information about help

[brunats]

- What I did
Updated the help messages for the core commands and added comments to some public functions found in the modified files.

- How I did it

Changing the help messages according to the documentation and adding comments on the necessary public functions (in files already changed previously).

- How to verify it

Exec rit
Before:

Now:

Prints updated on Jul 14 at 7:03 pm

- Description for the changelog

Improving information about help

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #256 into master will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #256      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.43%   67.45%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          71       71              
  Lines        2721     2722       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1835     1836       +1     
  Misses        656      656              
  Partials      230      230              

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/cmd/create_formula.go	57.60% <ø> (ø)
pkg/cmd/logout.go	85.71% <ø> (ø)
pkg/cmd/add.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/cmd/autocomplete.go	96.61% <100.00%> (+0.05%)	⬆️
pkg/cmd/build.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/cmd/create.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/cmd/delete.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/cmd/delete_context.go	33.33% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/cmd/delete_repo.go	39.58% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/cmd/init.go	77.47% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 5 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update efd4434...6c3bf27. Read the comment docs.

[victor-schumacher]

Good job! It became much clearer with examples.
Do you think it is a good idea not to use the word "objects"? For me it is not valuable information.

[brunats]

Good job! It became much clearer with examples.
Do you think it is a good idea not to use the word "objects"? For me it is not valuable information.

Looking again, I agree with you, let's see what the other reviewers think and depending on I remove the 'objects'.