Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Attribution of datadir fixture is insufficient #24

Closed
pmeier opened this issue Oct 3, 2021 · 5 comments
Closed

Attribution of datadir fixture is insufficient #24

pmeier opened this issue Oct 3, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@pmeier
Copy link

pmeier commented Oct 3, 2021

The docstring currently only links to an StackOverflow answer:

Source: https://stackoverflow.com/a/29631801/

StackOverflow answers are published under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license, which requires more. Especially the ShareAlike part might be problematic, since unlockNN is distributed under the MIT license.

@a-ws-m
Copy link
Owner

a-ws-m commented Oct 14, 2021

Thanks for pointing that out, do you think it's sufficient to remove that line?

@pmeier
Copy link
Author

pmeier commented Oct 15, 2021

That would make matters worse since in that you case you would outright plagiarize the code. I'm not experienced with the law side of things, so I won't make a recommendation. My impression is that it is (very) common practice in the industry to simply copy / paste code from other people, but scientific publications should be held to a higher standard here. cc @osorensen as editor of this JOSS review.

@osorensen
Copy link
Contributor

@pmeier and @a-ws-m; I'm not immediately sure about this, so will hear with the editorial team and get back to you.

@pmeier pmeier changed the title Attribution of datadir fixture is insignificant Attribution of datadir fixture is insufficient Oct 17, 2021
@osorensen
Copy link
Contributor

@pmeier and @a-ws-m, having searched a bit, it seems to me like adding the link to the StackOverflow answer the way it is done here is appropriate. I am not a lawyer, but with regards to the standards of scientific publications, I think this is fine since the solution from StackOverflow is about testing the software, and not part of the core of the code.

a-ws-m added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 19, 2021
@a-ws-m
Copy link
Owner

a-ws-m commented Oct 19, 2021

OK, I'll leave the citation there and close this issue. Thanks for checking this!

@a-ws-m a-ws-m closed this as completed Oct 19, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants