refactor: add RequestOptions to multitransport client#215
Conversation
Summary of ChangesHello @ishymko, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request refactors the Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request correctly refactors the Client class to propagate RequestOptions down to the transport layer by adding an optional options parameter to its public methods. The implementation is straightforward and consistent across the class. However, there are a couple of areas for improvement. Firstly, the JSDoc comments for the newly added options parameter are missing, which impacts code clarity and maintainability. Secondly, and more critically, the corresponding unit tests do not appear to have been updated to reflect the changes in method signatures. This is essential to ensure that the refactoring has not introduced any regressions.
Description
Propagate
RequestOptionsdown toTransport.Re #198, was missing in the original PR - wasn't release yet, so no impact.