Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: remove env config in public key api and cert rotation api #96

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

capri-xiyue
Copy link
Contributor

remove env config in public key api and cert rotation api

@capri-xiyue capri-xiyue requested review from a team, sethvargo and raserva July 26, 2022 20:45
@capri-xiyue capri-xiyue changed the title feat: remove env config in public key api and cert rotation api WIP: feat: remove env config in public key api and cert rotation api Jul 26, 2022
@capri-xiyue capri-xiyue requested a review from yolocs July 26, 2022 20:45
@capri-xiyue capri-xiyue changed the title WIP: feat: remove env config in public key api and cert rotation api WIP: feat: remove env config in public key api and cert rotation api(DO NOT REVIEW) Jul 26, 2022
@capri-xiyue capri-xiyue changed the title WIP: feat: remove env config in public key api and cert rotation api(DO NOT REVIEW) feat: remove env config in public key api and cert rotation api Jul 26, 2022
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("failed to load config: %w", err)
}

firestoreDoc, err := util.ParseFirestoreDocResource(cryptoCfg.FirestoreDocResourceName)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know if we want this to be firestore per the doc just shared out. I'm worried about the coupling here.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we're unsure about firestore, maybe we should defer using firestore at all. It's not like we're missing functionality without it. Thoughts?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agree on deferring

Copy link
Contributor Author

@capri-xiyue capri-xiyue Jul 26, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ok. I will revert the previous PR which already uses firestore #91 #97 and https://github.com/abcxyz/infra/pull/10

@capri-xiyue
Copy link
Contributor Author

closed because we are deferring the firestore

@verbanicm verbanicm deleted the issue_94 branch February 26, 2024 23:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants