Mention only zone names prefixed with 2 provide IPv6 server addresses at this time #238
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PoolMUC
changed the title
|
Separating the two would be nice, if it's not too much hassle! |
PoolMUC
force-pushed
the
mention-that-ipv6-only-with-name-prefix-2
branch
from
4ebe849 to
e5d1db2
Compare
|
Ok, separated into two commits. |
For en, and fr and de translations.
PoolMUC
force-pushed
the
mention-that-ipv6-only-with-name-prefix-2
branch
from
885837a to
dd8cee5
Compare
abh
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
5bfa803 to
e43f7cf
Compare
|
Thank you for removing this needless bit of friction.
How could those of us who are motivated to pursue further IPv6 adoption contribute to this "strategy and timeline"? Or at least, where could we learn more about that part of the project and track its progress? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
For en, and fr and de translations. This would resolve #198 and similar while PR #237 or similar are pending. It would be updated or removed again in due course as per strategy and timeline for enabling IPv6 in further zones (beyond those prefixed by 2).
Plus a bunch of nit fixes, consistency enhancements, ...
The latter actually are kind of a feature creep that happened while working on the former. If you want me to separate the two, just let me know.