Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RTN15d #249

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2016
Merged

RTN15d #249

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 26, 2016

Conversation

ricardopereira
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@ricardopereira
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this should be rebased with #228 fixes.

context("connection failures once CONNECTED") {

// RTN15d
pending("should recover from disconnection and messages delivered once the connection is resumed") {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we change this to "should recover from disconnection and publish queued messages once the connection is resumed"?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actually, I may have misread RTN15d and this suggested change is wrong. However, is this test then not the same as RTN15a, I'm not sure why there are two different tests?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You right, I noticed that. I will change the #244.

@ricardopereira
Copy link
Contributor Author

Rebased with master with changes: 7b8e8f5.

@mattheworiordan
Copy link
Member

LGTM

1 similar comment
@tcard
Copy link
Contributor

tcard commented Feb 25, 2016

LGTM

ricardopereira added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2016
@ricardopereira ricardopereira merged commit 7274316 into master Feb 26, 2016
@ricardopereira ricardopereira deleted the RTN15d branch February 26, 2016 01:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants