Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fromCipherKey does not match spec #492

Closed
tomczoink opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

fromCipherKey does not match spec #492

tomczoink opened this issue Jul 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working. It's clear that this does need to be fixed.

Comments

@tomczoink
Copy link

In the Java library there's a method fromCipherKey, however according to the spec it should instead be withCipherKey (https://docs.ably.io/client-lib-development-guide/features/#TB3). We should ensure the method matches the spec.

@tomczoink tomczoink added the bug Something isn't working. It's clear that this does need to be fixed. label Jul 12, 2019
@paddybyers
Copy link
Member

@amihaiemil are you able to look at this please? Check the spec for exactly what needs to be implemented. If an existing method in the library has the wrong name or signature, then it should be kept but annotated with @deprecated. Tests should exist for both the original and corrected API.

@amihaiemil amihaiemil self-assigned this Nov 1, 2019
amihaiemil added a commit to amihaiemil/ably-java that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2019
amihaiemil added a commit to amihaiemil/ably-java that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2019
amihaiemil added a commit to amihaiemil/ably-java that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2019
amihaiemil added a commit to amihaiemil/ably-java that referenced this issue Nov 1, 2019
@amihaiemil
Copy link
Contributor

@tomczoink PR #513 has been merged. I'm closing this. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working. It's clear that this does need to be fixed.
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants