Integrations: Add note around webhook data envelope support #2269
Conversation
|
It is probably worth mentioning that when creating the rule on the integrations dashboard unselecting enveloped will therefore result in an error This should have a review from deved team |
- This came from `REA-2071`, where it wasn't obvious that only message and presence events can be sent as raw payload in webhooks. Trying to do the same with occupancy or lifecyle events would generate an error when trying to create the rule. I have added a small section to the docs to make this more clear, in the hopes we will avoid some confusion.
m-hulbert
force-pushed
the
update-webhooks-enveloping-support
branch
from
a5e073e
to
f8a0721
Compare
@mclark-ably I think a better UX would be if we disabled the functionality in the dashboard based on which source you select. I've pushed a few minor changes, if everyone is happy with those then I'll merge 🙂 |
Thanks @m-hulbert , I agree but I don't know what the complexities are around this and would need to be a web team task (see internal comment https://ably-real-time.slack.com/archives/C8SPU4589/p1725986843113469?thread_ts=1725965046.845339&cid=C8SPU4589) |
Description
When creating a new Webhook integration rule, it wasn't obvious that only message and presence events can be sent as raw payload in webhooks. Trying to do the same with occupancy or lifecycle events would generate an error when trying to create the rule. I have added a small section to the docs to make this clearer, in the hopes we will avoid future confusion.
Review
Instructions on how to review the PR.