Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some python packages licenses detection issues #419

Open
pombredanne opened this issue Dec 30, 2016 · 4 comments
Open

Some python packages licenses detection issues #419

pombredanne opened this issue Dec 30, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@pombredanne
Copy link
Member

As reported by @akaihola in #417

I am encountering suspicious results with scancode for a few packages which have either heavily modified licenses or have come up with their own license. Some examples:

  • pyproj 1.9.5.1
  • Matplotlib 1.5.3 (licenses of some of the included components, e.g. stix, yorick, pnpoly, bakoma, qhull, agg24)
  • Pillow 3.4.2
@pombredanne
Copy link
Member Author

@akaihola any hint of the issue you have been facing?

In the meantime I will be running some detection tests for these using these commands:

mkdir 419
cd 419
# these pip commands ensure only sources are fetched (no prebuilt wheels) and that deps are fetched too.
pip download --no-binary :all: -d . pyproj==1.9.5.1
pip download --no-binary :all: -d . Matplotlib==1.5.3
pip download --no-binary :all: -d . Pillow==3.4.2
extractcode --verbose .
scancode -n 4 -clip . ../py-419.json

@pombredanne
Copy link
Member Author

@akaihola there are indeed some inaccurate detections. I will commit new detection rules and tests.

@pombredanne
Copy link
Member Author

@akaihola I have not forgotten you here... I will come back to this this week.

@pombredanne pombredanne added this to the v3.1 milestone Nov 4, 2018
pombredanne added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2020
These are various rules that improve the detection and use the new
secrete-labs-2011 license

Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
pombredanne added a commit that referenced this issue Sep 4, 2020
Signed-off-by: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
@pombredanne pombredanne removed this from the v3.3 milestone Sep 24, 2021
@SidharajYadav
Copy link

how i can contribute in this issuse

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants