Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

djLint workflow name misleading / not reflective of default config #84

Open
koeaw opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

djLint workflow name misleading / not reflective of default config #84

koeaw opened this issue Nov 12, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@koeaw
Copy link
Contributor

koeaw commented Nov 12, 2024

The djLint workflow name suggests it's used for linting:

name: Run djlint linter via poetry

but its default config triggers the formatter:

options:
required: false
type: string
default: "--check"

Since djLint itself already suggests that linting is involved, it would be be good to be extra clear about what the workflow does/doesn't do out of the box.

If we wanted to bring extra attention to the dual nature of tools like Ruff and djLint, we could alternatively update both workflow names to mention both applications.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant