Update rxjsObservableConfig for rxjs 6

[wuct]

Need some discussion before merging:

1. There were rxjs4ObservableConfig.js and rxjsObservableConfig.js (for rxjs 5) before. This PR upgrade rxjsObservableConfig.js directly to adopt rxjs 6, but it's a breaking change. We might want to create separate files for both rxjs 5 and rxjs 6.

2. Rxjs used to polyfill Symbol.observable, but it has been removed since feat(Symbol.observable): is no longer polyfilled ReactiveX/rxjs#3387. We might need to add a notice about polyfill Symbol.observable to the doc.

[wuct]

It seems like rxjs 6 doesn't throw this error anymore. I need dig deeper into this test.

[istarkov]

What are u think to split library on 2, ie recompose and recompose-rx(-observable, -blabla) and move all the streaming parts out of the recompose library.

Also I think we can move on https://github.com/facebook/react/tree/master/packages/create-subscription to support async in the future

[wuct]

It would be a good idea to separate them. But I'm thinking about keeping the es-observable parts remain in Recompose and move only those 3rd-party-config files into other libraries. The reason for me to separate them is to have better version controlling.

And yes, I think we need to introduce create-subscription to handle streaming events.

[OliverJAsh]

RxJS 6 has been out for awhile now. Is this PR good to merge? Re. the suggestion of moving 3rd-party-config files into other libraries, perhaps keep that idea to a separate PR, so we can unblock this one?

[elmarburke]

For those people waiting for this PR, there is a simple configuration possible to get recompose working with RxJS@^6.0.0:

import { from } from 'rxjs';

setObservableConfig({
  fromESObservable: from,
});