Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add support for default data provider policies #1352

Open
prioux opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1390
Open

Add support for default data provider policies #1352

prioux opened this issue Oct 6, 2023 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #1390
Assignees
Labels
Admin Features or bugs related to administrative features Priority: Low To implement when someone actually requests it! User Interface

Comments

@prioux
Copy link
Member

prioux commented Oct 6, 2023

Currently, an admin can configure a data provider with limits as to which other data providers it can copy files to, and which portals/bourreaux the data can be synced to.

This shows up as a large array of checkboxes, in the data provider 'show' page, one checkbox per other data provider and per portal/bourreau. It's very cumbersome when there are hundred of data providers and the admin want to disable copying to all of them, for instance. All these checkboxes are stored in ugly metadata on the DP.

A data provider should have a few 'main' flags that control the default behavior to all DPs, and the user interface for selecting other DPs for exclusion/inclusion be chnaged to make it more convenient.

@prioux prioux added User Interface Priority: Low To implement when someone actually requests it! Admin Features or bugs related to administrative features labels Oct 6, 2023
@MontrealSergiy MontrealSergiy self-assigned this Apr 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Admin Features or bugs related to administrative features Priority: Low To implement when someone actually requests it! User Interface
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants