prettier rules

[bryanmacfarlane]

• Suggesting a set of prettier rules (same as toolkit repo)
• Adding prettier to dev packages to ensure we're all using the same version
• Adding npm run script to ensure devs can run pre-checkin
• minor audit cmd line fix

After rules merged, contributor will run prettier and enable (uncomment the lines in the workflow)

[singingwolfboy]

Can we please focus on reviewing and merging #16? I would like to get credit for my work, in the form of a commit on the master branch that has my username attached.

[singingwolfboy]

Prettier recommends pinning an exact version.

[bryanmacfarlane]

I'm fine with major version binding. Semver should hold compat on major versions. It's also consistent with jest and the other repos.

[bryanmacfarlane]

As pointed out in the review of #16, the PR changing all the lines is not viable to review by a core contributor. It forces the contributor to review every line in the project and compare against rules that weren't part of the PR. What should have been part of the PR (the rules, package.json, workflow changes and package scripts) were not part of the PR and what was in the PR is not really usable. I need a core contributor to actually run the format and for the CI to validate it.

However thanks for creating the issue. Creating an issue prior to the PR with a discussion on the rules would have avoided the unnecessary work. Hope that helps.