-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Windows Server 2022 builds are taking 4x longer than on Windows Server 2019 #5166
Comments
My build times just dropped to 5-10 minutes. All that changed was I downgraded the .net 6 sdk to .net 5. I doubt that's related, but I am seeing times on par with what I used to get. |
@xt0rted hi! Is it possible for you to provide the minimal steps to reproduce the issue? We can make some experiments if we have reproducible examples |
@miketimofeev I can't reliably reproduce this. I see the issue in a couple of my private repos, but it seems to come and go now. It's only happening with the Windows 2022 workflows though, downgrading to 2019 where possible fixes it and the build times remain consistent. I'll keep seeing if there's a way to reproduce this though. About 2 weeks ago I had a build on |
@xt0rted Hello! Thanks, we will take a look! |
@xt0rted I'm afraid we can't proceed with the investigation without a reproducible example. We don't have access to the tickets, I'm afraid. |
Not sure if it's related, but here's an instance where the Windows 2022 build took 3x longer than the Windows 2019 build https://github.com/xt0rted/dotnet-rimraf/actions/runs/2041805895. I don't have a Windows 2019 build to compare to for this one, but you can see the Windows 2022 build is significantly longer than the macOS or Ubuntu builds https://github.com/xt0rted/dotnet-run-script/actions/runs/2041939525. |
Can tell that, I having the same issue as it is. Using Windows Server 2022, builds taking quite a longer time than 2019. |
My Windows 2022 builds are so slow that they're repeatedly timing out and/or having issues provisioning resources. Works fine with 2019. https://github.com/lowlydba/lowlydba.sqlserver/actions/runs/2458069276 |
@lowlydba, Is it possible to replace |
D'oh! I'm curious how that worked in the first place. Unfortunately, after fixing it still is erroring out. |
I am able to reproduce this issue on my self-agent. Currently we are getting BSOD on Windows Server 2022 with WSLv1. We are planning to investigate if we could migrate to WSLv2 from WSLv1. I will let you know as soon as I find something. |
Hello @xt0rted. Sorry for the late response. Does the issue reproduce with new images ? |
@dmitry-shibanov I haven't been working on the projects where I first encountered this (the ones in the original screen shots) but I do still see slower Windows 2022 times in one of my public projects. Windows is always the slowest, and in some cases by 6x or more for a pretty simple build & test workflow.
With the announcement of larger runners are there any specs available for what type of hardware they're using? Specifically how does i/o compare on the larger runners vs. the existing ones? |
@dmitry-shibanov I'm revisiting this and testing Actions vs. DevOps at work. Here's another very consistently reproducible example of the difference in Windows 2022 times vs. other platforms. The Ubuntu runs are failing due to a unit test, but they're running to completion so it's still a fair comparison, and fixing the test doesn't yield different results. While working on this it was pointed out to me that since it costs 2x per minute for the Windows runners, and they take 2-4x longer to run, that in the end you're paying 4-8x for Windows over Ubunutu in this example. That's pretty ridiculous and makes this a really hard sell over sticking with a larger custom VM on DevOps. |
For those interested, I did some investigation of various performance optimization options (NTFS settings, virtual drives with different file systems), including the necessary scripts and measurements here: Lombiq/GitHub-Actions#32 Spoiler alert: I didn't find anything that would be possible to use and would help. |
Does it have anything to do with .NET Core SDK 6.0.401 only being installed on 2022 and not on 2019? |
Windows runners are always painfully slow. I use both Windows and Linux runners a lot, and Windows is always much much slower. Take a look at this public repository's workflows -- click on any run: https://github.com/graphql-dotnet/server/actions/workflows/test.yml You'll see that runs on Windows always take nearly double the time. Here's another repository: https://github.com/graphql-dotnet/graphql-dotnet/actions/workflows/test-code.yml Sometimes the Windows runners do run similar to Linux runners. But more often than not they are nearly twice as slow. For example see this run -- 6 min on Linux vs 12 min on Windows -- and note that the Ubuntu workflow has more build steps!
Totally agree. It would at least be better if it ran equally as fast and they just charged 4x. |
This is to make sure we stay cross-platform. Note that the Windows build and test is [a lot slower than Linux and Windows](actions/runner-images#7320). Because of that, I had to change the wait in one of the tests. Also, I'm using windows-2019, which is at least 2x faster than windows-latest: actions/runner-images#5166 On macOS, I ran into an issue where CloseRead on a connection that was already fully read causes an error, so I needed to update the test there too. It was a huge pain to figure out what was going on.
This may improve performance due to actions/runner-images#5166.
This may improve performance due to actions/runner-images#5166.
I also can see a significantly worse performance on Windows agents in my new project where I build a in a quite wide matrix of configurations: Just some numbers from my pipeline showing the differences:
When looking into the steps they all take a significance longer on Windows. Cloning, building, artifacts, CPU tasks. |
Try out windows-2019 instead of windows-latest (which should resolve to windows-2022) also see actions/runner-images#5166
see speed issues in actions/runner-images#5166
* Explain how to deal with the prepared databases as a contributor * Add helper script to download all sqlite databases * Drop dangerous test that gamble with floating point accuracy * Stop tracking SQLITE files as github is expensive * Set version number to 2.1.1 * Move JupyterLab out of dev, simplify jupyterlab target * Restrict several package versions and explicitly mention sphinx-tabs to improve pip version resolution * Use windows-2019 instead of windows-latest in GitHub CI - see speed issues in actions/runner-images#5166
This may just be anecdotal but my hope is maybe it spurs an idea for someone or maybe some other person searching for answers will see this. We run CI tests which detect hotkey presses from a native node module. By design when the native module detects an event is passes the event to a JS thread's callback to handle it using libuv. When we moved to windows-2022 these stopped functioning. I tracked it down to extreme delays in libuv's |
Description
Over the last 2 weeks I've noticed runs on the
windows-2022
image taking 4x longer, and sometimes more than that, than on thewindows-2019
image. In all of these instances nothing's changed between runs aside from the version of Windows being used.One of the examples I'm looking at from about 2 weeks ago took 7 minutes to complete, while a run from a day or two ago took 24 minutes. This increase in time is consistent across all new runs in our org.
In another repo I downgraded our build scripts & vm to Windows Server 2019 and the time went from 19 minutes down to about 5.5 minutes. I'm unable to permanently move back to 2019 though because new builds depend on VS 2022.
While testing something else I ran a simple checkout & build of an empty .net project and the build times for
ubuntu-latest
(25s) andwindows-2019
(1m 12s) were about what I'd expect, while thewindows-2022
image clocked in at 8m 14s.All of this was originally reported to support in ticket 1521042 but I was told to open an issue here instead. That ticket has org/repo names and links to each run.
Virtual environments affected
Image version and build link
None of the repos are public but these are the Run Ids for each.
Runs in the image:
windows-2019
20220207.1
windows-2022
20220220.1
From another similar repo:
windows-2019
20220223.1
windows-2022
20220220.1
Test repo:
ubuntu-latest
20220220.1
windows-2019
20220223.1
windows-2022
20220220.1
Is it regression?
No response
Expected behavior
For run times on par with Windows 2019
Actual behavior
Run times up to 4-5x longer than Windows 2019
Repro steps
Run a .net full framework build on Windows 2019 and 2022, the 2022 runs should take significantly longer.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: