Make gem compatible with old polyamorous require #1145
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looks reasonable @rtweeks can you please rebase? |
By providing `polyamorous.rb` in the `lib` folder, projects that previously depended directly on `polyamorous` can just switch the dependency to `ransack` without changing their calls to `require`.
rtweeks
force-pushed
the
polyamorous-compatibility
branch
from
7bfee0c to
1c62d55
Compare
|
Rebased on d508857. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
By providing
polyamorous.rbin thelibfolder, projects thatpreviously depended directly on
polyamorouscan just switch thedependency to
ransackwithout changing their calls torequire.