-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 176
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Add portal visualization to TrackingVolume
#4029
fix: Add portal visualization to TrackingVolume
#4029
Conversation
WalkthroughIn the realm of geometric visualization, a subtle yet significant enhancement emerges within the Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant TrackingVolume
participant Portal
participant Visualization3D
TrackingVolume->>TrackingVolume: Iterate portals
TrackingVolume->>Portal: visualize()
Portal-->>Visualization3D: Render portal surface
Poem
Finishing Touches
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
Core/src/Geometry/TrackingVolume.cpp (1)
749-752
: Hmmmm, good changes these are! Portal visualization, added well it has been.Clean and focused implementation, I see. Consistent with existing visualization patterns, it is. Through all portals it loops, their surfaces it shows.
A suggestion for readability, I have:
for (const auto& portal : portals()) { - portal.surface().visualize(helper, gctx, portalViewConfig); + const auto& surface = portal.surface(); + surface.visualize(helper, gctx, portalViewConfig); }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Core/src/Geometry/TrackingVolume.cpp
(1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (9)
- GitHub Check: merge-sentinel
- GitHub Check: unused_files
- GitHub Check: missing_includes
- GitHub Check: macos
- GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu_extra (ubuntu2204_clang, 20)
- GitHub Check: docs
- GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu
- GitHub Check: linux_ubuntu_extra (ubuntu2204, 20)
- GitHub Check: build_debug
|
--- END COMMIT MESSAGE ---
Any further description goes here, @-mentions are ok here!
feat
,fix
,refactor
,docs
,chore
andbuild
types.Summary by CodeRabbit